Go to navigation Go to content
Toll-Free: 800-752-0042
Phone: 757-460-7776
Shapiro & Appleton

Cirrus Parachute Plane Safety Questioned Due to Fatality/Death Rates Compared to Cessna Single Engine Airplanes

Comments (0)

My partner Richard N. Shapiro touched off a national aircraft safety news firestorm among airplane pilots like myself, with an article comparing deaths/fatalities suffered in Cirrus vs. Cessna planes (click here:  Critic Raises Questions over Crash and Death Rates of Cirrus Aircraft In “Dead Pilots Don’t Lie”--Surprising Fatality Safety Analysis of Cirrus “Parachute” Planes vs. Cessna Small Planes).
The provocative article found that the Cirrus "parachute"plane has higher crashes/deaths/fatalities per hour flown in excess of the standard single engine Cessna over the ast ten years-despite the special safety features of the Cirrus.

The
Injuryboard National news desk (Jane Akre/Lisa Brown)  then wrote about the Cirrus safety issue and pilots for and against Cirrus have weighed in by writing comments. 

I am a
pilot, and handle airplane crash litigation myself. Pilots tend to believe a crash can never happen to them-a form of defensive attribution. So, when safety statistics show the Cirrus is associated with higher death rates than Cessna's-for one example-it provokes major debate.  If Shapiro's article promotes a close look at Cirrus pilot training and helps prevent a future pilot's death, it will be a positive thing.

 

 

 

 

 

Be the first to comment!

Post a Comment

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."

Name:*

Email:* (will not be published)

Message:*

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

Avvo The Best lawyers in America Super lawyers Best Law Firms US News Verdicts and Settlements AV LexisNexis

Live Chat