Why are premises liability cases tough in Virginia? | Shapiro, Washburn & Sharp

Premises liability cases involve injuries or accidents that occur on someone else’s property due to unsafe or hazardous conditions. While these cases may seem straightforward, they can be notoriously challenging to prove for several reasons. Here is a brief overview of why premises liability cases are tough to prove. For more detailed information, contact one of our Virginia Beach personal injury lawyers.

Burden of Proof

Like any legal case, premises liability claims require the injured party (plaintiff) to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. This means they must demonstrate that it is more likely than not that the property owner (defendant) was negligent and that this negligence directly led to the plaintiff’s injuries. Meeting this burden of proof can be difficult, especially if there is limited evidence or conflicting accounts of what happened.

Complexity of Liability

Unlike other types of personal injury cases, premises liability cases often involve complex legal principles regarding property ownership, control, and duty of care. Determining who is legally responsible for maintaining the property and ensuring its safety can be challenging, particularly in cases involving shared or leased properties, government-owned premises, or commercial establishments with multiple parties involved in property management.

Varied Standards of Care

The standard of care that property owners owe to visitors can vary depending on the legal status of the visitor. For example, property owners owe a higher duty of care to invitees (such as customers or guests) compared to licensees (social guests) or trespassers. Proving that the property owner breached their duty of care and failed to maintain a safe environment often requires a thorough understanding of these legal standards and how they apply to the specific circumstances of the case.

Contributory Negligence

In many premises liability cases, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff’s own actions or negligence contributed to their injuries. If the plaintiff is found to have contributed to the accident in any way, their recovery may be reduced or barred entirely under the doctrine of contributory negligence. Proving that the plaintiff was not at fault or that their actions were reasonable under the circumstances can be a significant challenge.

Proof of Hazardous Condition

Central to premises liability claims is the existence of a hazardous condition on the property that caused the plaintiff’s injuries. However, proving the existence of such a condition and establishing that the property owner knew or should have known about it can be difficult. Without sufficient evidence, such as maintenance records, inspection reports, or witness testimony, it can be challenging to demonstrate that the property owner was negligent in addressing or warning about the hazardous condition.

Evidentiary Challenges

Premises liability cases often rely on physical evidence, such as photographs, video footage, or documentation of the accident scene. However, obtaining and preserving this evidence can be challenging, particularly if the accident occurred in a public place or if the property owner quickly rectifies the hazardous condition after the incident. Additionally, memories fade over time, and witnesses may be difficult to locate or may provide conflicting accounts of what happened.

Insurance Defense Tactics

Property owners, particularly those with insurance coverage, often have legal resources and defense strategies at their disposal to contest premises liability claims. Insurance companies may employ aggressive tactics to minimize their liability and discredit the plaintiff’s case, making it essential for injured parties to have experienced legal representation to counter these strategies effectively.

While these cases may be tough to prove, with the right legal representation and a compelling case, injured parties can obtain the compensation they deserve for their injuries and losses.

 

RELATED CONTENT