In-Depth Articles On
Virginia & North Carolina Law

A puddle near a freezer or a loose mat at a store entrance can put you on the floor before you see the danger. The store may apologize and make an incident report, but that doesn’t mean it will accept responsibility for your injuries. You’ll need evidence of more than the fall itself.

A Virginia Beach slip-and-fall lawyer can investigate what caused the accident and what the store knew before it happened. Virginia law asks several separate questions: Was there a dangerous condition? Should the store have dealt with it? Did it cause your injury?

What Does a Virginia Store Owe Its Customers?

A customer shopping in a store is generally an invited visitor. The store must use ordinary care to keep the areas customers use reasonably safe. It must address dangerous conditions it creates or knows about, and it may need to warn customers about hazards it should have discovered.

That duty doesn’t make the store responsible for every accident on its property. If someone spills a drink just before you step in it, staff may have had no reasonable chance to find the spill. A claim depends on the specific hazard, how it got there and what the store had time to do.

What Must You Prove About the Hazard?

First, identify what made you fall. It might be spilled liquid, fallen produce or a raised floor mat. “I slipped in the aisle” describes the event, but it doesn’t necessarily establish that the floor was unsafe. Photos of the spot, your shoes and the substance can help answer that question.

Try to pin down the location before the scene changes. A worker may clean a spill immediately, which helps prevent another injury but also removes evidence. If you didn’t see what caused the fall, a witness or store camera may help.

How Do You Prove the Store Knew About It?

In many store fall cases, notice is the hardest issue. Actual notice means an employee knew about the hazard before you fell. A customer’s earlier complaint, an employee’s observation or a written maintenance report may help show that knowledge. Notice can also be inferred when the evidence shows the hazard was there long enough that staff reasonably should have found it.

There isn’t a fixed number of minutes that makes every spill the store’s responsibility. The location, appearance of the substance and evidence of inspections can all affect what the store should have known. You need facts that connect the store to the particular hazard, rather than a general statement that stores know spills sometimes happen.

The Virginia Supreme Court made that point in a case involving a shopper who slipped on a snap bean. The bean was found near her foot, but an employee had passed through the produce area shortly before the fall. Without proof that the store put it there or knew it was on the floor in time to act, the customer couldn’t establish negligence.

What If Store Staff Created the Danger?

The analysis can change if a worker caused the unsafe condition. Imagine an employee mopping a floor and leaving it wet without a warning. The question isn’t whether another employee happened to discover the water later. Evidence that staff created the hazard can establish the store’s connection to it.

The same concern may arise if a worker places a display where customers walk or leaves equipment in an aisle. You still need to show that the condition was dangerous and caused your fall. Witnesses, work records and video may help distinguish a hazard created by the store from one left by another customer.

Did the Store Have a Reasonable Chance to Act?

Knowing about a problem and responding to it are separate questions. A store may be able to clean a spill, block off the area or give a useful warning. Whether its response was reasonable depends on the circumstances. A small spill reported seconds before a fall is different from water collecting for an extended period near a leaking cooler.

A warning sign also has to address the danger the customer faced. Its mere presence somewhere nearby doesn’t settle whether it was visible or whether the store took reasonable care. A Virginia Beach slip-and-fall lawyer can compare the incident report with photos, inspection records and witness accounts to build a clearer timeline.

How Do You Link the Fall to Your Injuries?

Even strong proof of a wet floor won’t establish the full claim unless you connect the fall to your injuries. Medical records can show when you sought treatment, what doctors found and how your condition changed.

Keep track of treatment and the ways the injury affects daily life or work. If you had a prior condition, the store’s insurer may argue that the fall didn’t cause all your symptoms. Medical evidence can help sort out what existed before the accident and what changed afterward.

Can the Store Blame You for Not Seeing the Hazard?

It may try. Virginia follows contributory negligence, which can bar recovery if your own failure to use reasonable care contributed to the fall. A store might argue that the danger was open and obvious, that you ignored a warning or that you weren’t watching where you walked.

Those arguments don’t end every claim. Customers aren’t required to stare at the floor with every step, and whether a condition was obvious can depend on the facts. In a Virginia grocery store case, the Supreme Court explained that an unexpected and substantial distraction may excuse a shopper’s failure to notice an obvious hazard. Photos and witness accounts can show what a shopper could actually see.

What Should You Do After a Store Fall?

Tell a manager where you fell and ask for the incident to be recorded. If you can do so safely, photograph the hazard, the surrounding area and any warnings before conditions change. Get witness contact information and keep the shoes you wore. Seek medical care and save the records.

Act promptly if you want the store’s video preserved. Virginia generally gives an injured person two years to file a personal injury lawsuit, but footage may disappear much sooner. An attorney can request relevant records and examine whether the evidence supports each part of the claim.

Shapiro, Washburn & Sharp handled a Virginia case in which a woman slipped on a wet restaurant floor and injured her wrist. A waitress’s account helped show that a carpet normally covering that spot had been removed, and the case settled for $150,000. A restaurant isn’t a store, but the example shows how a witness can help establish what a business knew about a hazard. Past results don’t guarantee a similar outcome.

If you fell in a store, don’t assume the incident report proves your claim or that the store’s denial defeats it. A Virginia Beach slip-and-fall lawyer at Shapiro, Washburn & Sharp can review the hazard, the store’s notice and the evidence of your injuries. Call (833) 997-1774 or fill out the online contact form to discuss what happened. For convenience, we have offices in Virginia Beach, Hampton, Norfolk, and Portsmouth.

RELATED CONTENT

 

Select A Category

Legal Options for Falling Merchandise Injuries

Big box and warehouse stores are a common destination for shoppers these days. While their low prices and convenience can attract consumers, patrons should also keep an eye on their surroundings to ensure their safety. Many of these stores stack their merchandise in order to save on warehouse space and keep more inventory on hand….

read more