757-460-7776 Website Visit contest 1-800-752-0042

Practice Areas

HSInjury Blog

Car & Motorcycle Accidents

view all

Crashes Caused by Trucks

view all

Medical Malpractice/Doctor Mistakes

view all

Railroad Injury/FELA

view all

Brain Damage/Head Injuries

view all

Wrongful Death

view all

Slips, Trips & Falls

view all

Mass Transit (Airline, Train, Bus)

view all

Dangerous Drugs/Product Recalls

view all

All Serious Injuries

view all

General

view all

Norfolk-Portsmouth Personal Injury Lawyer

Virginia Beach Personal Injury Lawyer

Northeast NC Personal Injury Lawyer

Firm News

View all

Library

Car & Motorcycle Accidents

View all

Crashes Caused by Trucks

View all

Medical Malpractice/Doctor Mistakes

View all

Railroad Injury/FELA

View all

Brain Damage/Head Injuries

View all

Wrongful Death

View all

Slips, Trips & Falls

View all

Mass Transit (Airline, Train, Bus)

View all

Dangerous Drugs/Product Recalls

View all

All Serious Injuries

View all

Testimony Excerpts from Personal Injury Cases

View all

Co-Counsel

View all

Firm Newsletters

View all

All We Do is Injury Law

View all

FREE Reports

View all

Virginia Supreme Court Decisions

View all

Directories

View all

Medical Legal Exhibits Used in Court

View all

General

View all

print

Personal Injury & Accident News

Attorney Discusses Truck Accidents in Winter Snowstorms

My colleague John Cooper wrote a blog about the high number of jackknifed tractor trailer accidents in Southwest Virginia during a recent winter storm. The challenges truck drivers face on the roads increases dramatically when black ice, snow, and high winds are added to the equation.

Read More About Attorney Discusses Truck Accidents in Winter Snowstorms...

back to top

Partners Set to Present for Norfolk & Portsmouth Bar Assoc. Seminar

The partners at Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis, & Appleton will be putting their over 100 years of legal experience to work at a seminar held by the Norfolk & Portsmouth Bar Association on Wednesday, April 28. The seminar is entitled, "Handling a Personal Injury Case: Phone Call to Verdict."

Topics to be discussed include:

·Necessary Elements to Prove Your Case

·Special Discovery Issues Pertaining to Personal Injury Cases

·Basics of Virginia Automobile Insurance

·Maximizing the Client's Recovery

·Effective Expert Witnesses

·Evidence to be Used in Settlement and Mediation

·Successful Jury Trials

·Ethical Issues Arising in Personal Injury Cases

The seminar will be held at the Dominion Tower, 4th Floor Meeting Room from 1:00pm to 4:00pm.

back to top

Use of "safe-surgery checklist" could reduce medical mistakes

My colleague Jim Lewis wrote a blog about the patient benefits of hospitals using a "safe-surgery checklist" on virginiabeach.injuryboard.com. The blog provides information on the startling number of surgical items left in patients each year as well as information on how surgeons can reduce or eliminate this problem through the use of a simple checklist. To learn more, please check out the blog here: http://virginiabeach.injuryboard.com/medical-malpractice/surgeons-could-improve-patient-safety-reduce-medical-mistakes-with-use-of-safesurgery-checklist-.aspx?googleid=277692

Read More About Use of "safe-surgery checklist" could reduce medical mistakes...

back to top

Attorney Discusses the High Car Crash Rate in Hampton Roads

My colleague Jim Lewis wrote about a new report revealing Hampton Roads has the highest car accident rate of any urban area in Virginia (VA). Fatal car crashes are increasing and some of the reasons these car wrecks occur are due to distracted driving and not wearing a seat belt. To learn more, check out the blog on the Norfolk Injury Board.

Read More About Attorney Discusses the High Car Crash Rate in Hampton Roads...

back to top

Attorney Examines Increase in Wrong Way Car Wrecks in HOV Lanes

My colleague Rick Shapiro posted a blog about the recent jump in wrong way car crashes in the HOV lanes in Virginia. The number of wrecks tripled from 2007 to 2008. The blog was posted on the Norfolk Injury Board and provides relevant stats on this important safety issue.

Read More About Attorney Examines Increase in Wrong Way Car Wrecks in HOV Lanes...

back to top

Attorney Discusses Prescribing Fentanyl/Duragesic Pain Patches

My colleague Rick Shapiro posted a blog discussing Fentanyl and Duragesic on the Virginia Beach Injury Board. Rick explores when it is, and isn't, appropriate to prescribe these powerful drugs. Many people have suffered negative side effects because they were misprescribed Fentanyl or Duragesic.

Read More About Attorney Discusses Prescribing Fentanyl/Duragesic Pain Patches...

back to top

Attorney Discusses Norfolk Southern Train Derailment

My colleague John Cooper posted on our specialty railroad accident blog on about a recent Norfolk Southern train derailment in Chattanooga, Tennessee (TN). Derailments are not uncommon for Norfolk Southern.  In fact, there were 134 NS train derailments in 2009.

Read More About Attorney Discusses Norfolk Southern Train Derailment...

back to top

Attorney Discusses Insurance Issues for "Road Warriors"

My colleague Rick Shapiro wrote an article explaining how "road warriors" in occupations that require high mileage on the highways have higher rates of accidents and injuries.  The article also explored which types of jobs carry the highest statistrical rates of injuries and wrecks, some which may surprise you with doctors and attorneys at the top of the list.


Read More About Attorney Discusses Insurance Issues for "Road Warriors"...

back to top

Law Firm Publishes New Consumer Guide on How to Handle a Truck Wreck

The law firm just published a new consumer guide on what to do in case you get into an accident with a commercial truck. These types of accidents are different from accidents involving two cars. There are federal regulations and different types of insurance. Plus, truck companies have a team of lawyers/investigators who are determined to try and reduce or completely deny a your potential injury claim.

Read More About Law Firm Publishes New Consumer Guide on How to Handle a Truck Wreck...

back to top

Attorney Examines Legal Protections for High-Speed Rail Workers

Rick Shapiro posted a blog discussing the issue of legal protections for workers hired to build high-speed rail. President Obama has made high-speed rail a major initiative investing nearly $13 billion in rail projects over the next five years. But will the workers hired to build and operate this rail be covered under FELA law or state law? To learn more, check out the blog here.

Read More About Attorney Examines Legal Protections for High-Speed Rail Workers...

back to top

Attorney Examines New Texting Ban on Commercial Truckers

Jim Lewis wrote a blog about the new texting bans for commercial truckers and bus operators. If a trucker is caught texting, they could face a fine of nearly $3,000. Many states have imposed texting laws and there's talk of expanding texting laws to the federal level.

Read More About Attorney Examines New Texting Ban on Commercial Truckers...

back to top

Attorney Examines Trucker's Request for Greater Schedule Flexibility

John Cooper wrote a blog discussing Hours of Service (HOS) rules for truckers and the request for greater flexibility by trucking associations. Current HOS rules stipulate a trucker can drive for 11 hours and then take 10 hours off or drive 34 hours and take 24 hours off. To learn, check out the blog here.

Read More About Attorney Examines Trucker's Request for Greater Schedule Flexibility...

back to top

Attorney Discusses Potential Law that May Make Seat Belt Laws Tougher

Jim Lewis wrote a blog on the Norfolk Injuryboard about a bill working its way through the Virginia General Assembly that would stiffen seat belt laws. The bill would upgrade seat belt violations to a primary offense. Currently in Virginia, seat belt laws are a secondary offense. 

Read More About Attorney Discusses Potential Law that May Make Seat Belt Laws Tougher...

back to top

Attorney Discusses the Risks Truckers Commonly Encounter on the Road

Rick Shapiro posted a blog about the common risks truckers encounter on the road and the fact that, when an accident occurs between a truck and a car/SUV, the trucker needs legal representation. To learn about this trucking accident issue, check out the blog here.

Read More About Attorney Discusses the Risks Truckers Commonly Encounter on the Road...

back to top

Attorney Examines the Battle between Amtrak and Railroad Worker Unions

Rick Shapiro wrote about the battle brewing between Amtrak and railroad worker unions over a potential snow removal waiver. This waiver would potentially expose railroad workers and contractor employees to injury since they may have to perform a risky task with little-to-no supervision and experience. To learn more about the potential railroad injury risks, check out the story here.

Read More About Attorney Examines the Battle between Amtrak and Railroad Worker Unions...

back to top

Attorney Discusses Railroad Companies Lack of Action with Asbestos

Rick Shapiro examines the lack of action taken by many railroad companies in addressing the health risks of asbestos and mesothelioma cancer. They didn't take the issue seriously and now numerous railroad workers are suffering from mesothelioma due to exposure at the workplace. To learn more about asbestos, mesothelioma, and railroads, please check out the blog here.

Read More About Attorney Discusses Railroad Companies Lack of Action with Asbestos...

back to top

Attorneys Discusses Faulty Brakes in Truck Wrecks

Rick Shapiro wrote a blog about the prevalence of faulty brakes in the trucking industry. Trucks are subject to federal regulations which stipulate the condition and effectiveness of commercial truck brakes. Unfortunately, many companies fail to adhere to these guidelines. To learn more about brake failures in truck crashes, check out the blog here. 

Read More About Attorneys Discusses Faulty Brakes in Truck Wrecks...

back to top

Attorney Discusses Positive Train Control Regulations for Railroads

John Cooper posted a new blog about the pending implementation of new positive train control systems regulations within the railroad industry on the firm's railroad accident and FELA law blog.  Positive train control systems are a major step forward for railroad safety and all railroad companies need to adhere to the new regulations by 2015. 

 

Read More About Attorney Discusses Positive Train Control Regulations for Railroads...

back to top

Attorney Applauds New Ethics Rules from BLET

The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) decided to change their code of compliance for desginated legal counsel which represents injured railroad workers. My colleague Rick Shapiro applauds the new ethics rules and will continue to represent railroad workers with the highest ethical standards. Read more about the new ethics guidelines here.

Read More About Attorney Applauds New Ethics Rules from BLET...

back to top

Attorney Takes on Misleading Chamber of Commerce Advertisements

The US Chamber of Commerce is running expensive TV ads highlighting the economic impact of the bad economy on small businesses, and suggesting that lawsuit abuse is a big cause?  Is lawsuit abuse or insurance defense attorney abuse costing consumers millions? Why are insurance companies and big companies funding the TV ads, and will consumers see any lower premiums as a trickle down affect if consumers become active in the area of lawsuit abuse. 

Read part one of the article by Rick Shapiro and then the  other articles in the series for a balanced approach to this issue.

Read More About Attorney Takes on Misleading Chamber of Commerce Advertisements...

back to top

Check Out our New Blog on Skiing Accidents and Assumption of Risk

John Cooper examines the assumption of risk in connection to individuals on ski trips. 

There can be artificial conditions that are not inherently part of skiing, and are not hazards voluntarily accepted by the skier or snowboarder. Our firm has experience handling these types of cases.

To learn more about skiing accidents, check out the blog here.  

Read More About Check Out our New Blog on Skiing Accidents and Assumption of Risk...

back to top

Blog on Various Rules dealing with Claims Against Cities/Government

Section 15.2-209 of the Code of Virginia requires that any person seeking to assert a claim for negligence against a city, county, or town provide notice to specific governmental authorities of the events giving rise to the claim within six months of the date of occurrence.

To learn more about the various rules that you must follow when filing an injury claim against the city/government, check out our blog here. 

Read More About Blog on Various Rules dealing with Claims Against Cities/Government...

back to top

Attorney Explores Injury and Accident Risks Associated with Defective Truck Tires

Rick Shapiro explored the risks associated with defective tires, bad installations, and misalignments on large trucks. Over 370,000 truck accidents occur in the U.S. each year. Bad tires play a role in some of these accidents.

To learn more about the connection between truck wrecks and defective tires, check out the blog here.  

Read More About Attorney Explores Injury and Accident Risks Associated with Defective Truck Tires...

back to top

Attorney Examines an Airplane Accident in Suffolk, Virginia

Jim Lewis wrote about an aviation accident which occurred at the Great Dismal Swamp area in Suffolk, Virginia (VA). The blog, posted on the Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, & Suffolk Injury Board, revealed that roughly 32 percent of all aviation accidents occur in non-commercial airplanes. 

To learn more about the Suffolk airplane accident, check out the blog here.  

Read More About Attorney Examines an Airplane Accident in Suffolk, Virginia...

back to top

Attorney Shocked by Number of Trucks and Tractor-Trailers on Roads with Black Ice, Snow

Rick Shapiro was traveling during a recent snow storm and witnessed a large number of tractor-trailers, 18 wheelers, and other large trucks on the road when they shouldn't have been. There are safety regulations these truckers need to adhere to because a tractor-trailer on black ice is a deadly combination. 

Learn more about the accident and injury risks associated with trucks on the road in winter weather conditions.  

Read More About Attorney Shocked by Number of Trucks and Tractor-Trailers on Roads with Black Ice, Snow...

back to top

Attorney Examines the Accident and Injury Risks Associated with Construction Projects

Randy Appleton wrote an in-depth blog about the risks associated with highway construction projects on our law firm's Virginia Trucking Accident blog. This is a prevalent issue considering the Recovery and Reinvestment Act designates billions of dollars for highway reconstruction and revitalization projects. 

To learn more about the accident and serious injury risks related to construction projects, check out the blog here.  

Read More About Attorney Examines the Accident and Injury Risks Associated with Construction Projects...

back to top

Attorney Examines Fire Safety of Holiday Candles

John Cooper wrote an in-depth blog about the safety implications of holiday candles on the Norfolk, Portsmouth, and Hampton, Virginia (VA) Injury Board. Holiday candles are great for celebrations, dinners, and other special occassions but also present a serious safety hazard.

To learn more about the safety risks of holiday candles from an experienced injury lawyer, check out the blog here.

Read More About Attorney Examines Fire Safety of Holiday Candles...

back to top

Attorney Explores Serious Injury Risks Associated with Dog Bites

John Cooper examined the serious injury risks associated with dog bites and dog attacks on the Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, & Suffolk Injury Board . You could lose a limb, suffer major lacerations, or even get an infection from a dog bite.

To learn more about the injury risks such as infection and laceration related to dog bites, check out the blog here.

Read More About Attorney Explores Serious Injury Risks Associated with Dog Bites...

back to top

Experienced Injury Attorney Discusses Increase in Car Wrecks During Holiday Season

John Cooper examines the increase in serious automobile crashes during the holiday season on the Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, & Suffolk Injury Board. Wintery weather, distracted driving, and driving under the influence of alcohol are all exacerbated during the holiday months leading to more fatalities on the road.

To learn more about the correlation between auto accidents and the holidays, check out the blog here.

Read More About Experienced Injury Attorney Discusses Increase in Car Wrecks During Holiday Season...

back to top

Important Question Answered Regarding an At-Fault Driver's Car Insurance Company Failing to Return Your Calls

John Cooper, an experienced car accident injury attorney, answered an important question regarding how to deal with an insurance company that isn't returning your phone calls.

Getting into a
car accident and suffering an injury is bad enough, but having to haggle with the at-fault driver's insurance company can make the ordeal even worse.    

Read More About Important Question Answered Regarding an At-Fault Driver's Car Insurance Company Failing to Return Your Calls...

back to top

Injury Lawyer Examines Proft Growth of Bayer Despite Dangers of Yaz and Yasmin

An injury lawyer wrote an in-depth blog on the surprising sales growth of Yaz and Yasmin despite revelations of the life-threatening side effects (like blood clots, gallstones, sudden numbness, depression, etc.) these dangerous drugs inflict on women.

Read More About Injury Lawyer Examines Proft Growth of Bayer Despite Dangers of Yaz and Yasmin...

back to top

Attorney Answers Important Questions about Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella

Emily Mapp Brannon answered some pertinent questions regarding the dangerous drugs Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella.

People have asked, "What exactly are Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella?"  


Here's another important question - "What are the differences between Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella?"

Read More About Attorney Answers Important Questions about Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella...

back to top

Attorney Lists the Numerous Side Effects Women May Suffer After Taking Yaz, Yasmin, or Ocella

Emily Mapp Brannon listed the potential side effects a woman can suffer after taking Yaz, Yasmin, or Ocella birth control pills. The list is extensive and some of the side effects can be life-threatening.

Learn about these terrible Yaz, Yasmin, and Ocella side effects here.

Read More About Attorney Lists the Numerous Side Effects Women May Suffer After Taking Yaz, Yasmin, or Ocella...

back to top

Check out Emily's Blog on Beacon House, a Great Place for Victims of Traumatic Brain Injury to Recuperate

Emily Mapp Brannon wrote an informative blog about Beacon House, a facility designed to help people who suffered a traumatic brain injury. It is based in Hampton Roads.

Learn more about Beacon House and traumatic brain injury here.

Read More About Check out Emily's Blog on Beacon House, a Great Place for Victims of Traumatic Brain Injury to Recuperate...

back to top

Accident Lawyer Rick Shapiro Writes about a Serious Wreck on the Firm's Blog about Commercial Vehicle Crashes

Rick Shapiro wrote an in-depth blog about a terrible accident on Highway 52 in Virginia (VA) where a tractor trailer's brakes failed. The driver was injured and it hasn't been determined why the brakes failed.

Learn more about this truck accident here.

Read More About Accident Lawyer Rick Shapiro Writes about a Serious Wreck on the Firm's Blog about Commercial Vehicle Crashes...

back to top

Baby on Board: Pregnant Drivers and Unborn Children at Risk for Injury

John Cooper wrote an in-depth article about the risks associated with pregnant women behind the wheel of an automobile. It's an issue that is overlooked and no new technology/advancements have been produced to improve the safety for soon-to-be-mother drivers.

Learn more about the injury risks associated with pregnant drivers.

Read More About Baby on Board: Pregnant Drivers and Unborn Children at Risk for Injury...

back to top

Locomotive Inspection Act Applies to Locomotive Trap Doors

A recent successful jury outcome in a FELA case in Illinois shows the power of the Locomotive Inspection Act (LIA).  The case was on behalf of a locomotive engineer who worked on a Metra train that had a defective trap door latch.  The latch released and hit the railroad worker in the head causing him to have traumatic headaches and ultimately disqualifying him from future railroad work.  Numerous events of trap door latches on locomotives giving way had been reported to the carrier. 

The federal railroad regulations require that locomotive trap doors are able to be securely latched.  The jury found a violation of that law but also felt that the railroad worker himself had 40 percent fault in not checking that the trap door was latched properly.  Under the Locomotive Inspection Act, any contributory negligence of the plaintiff is wiped out and doesn't matter.  This allowed the worker to obtain full compensation for his injury rather than have 40 percent of his damages taken away for his own comparative fault.  The power of this law protecting engineers and train crews when they get hurt because of defective locomotive engine parts often makes the difference in a successful FELA case outcome. 

An
experienced railroad trial lawyer knows how to find the defects and prove the case comes under the LIA.  I congratulate the excellent trial lawyers at Hoey & Farina who got this good result. 

back to top

Aerial Traffic Monitoring No More in Virginia

Jim Lewis wrote an interesting blog on the recent decision to hault aerial traffic monitoring in Virginia (VA). The move was made for budgetary reasons. Could this lead to an increase in car accidents? Find out here.

Read More About Aerial Traffic Monitoring No More in Virginia...

back to top

Halloween Produces Horrifying Statistics for Pedestrian Traffic Accidents

John Cooper wrote an informative blog on the dramatic increase of pedestrian traffic accidents during Halloween. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration revealed pedestrian accidents increased by 4.5 times on Halloween.

Learn more about the scary connection between pedestrian traffic accidents and Halloween.

Read More About Halloween Produces Horrifying Statistics for Pedestrian Traffic Accidents...

back to top

The Power of "Wiihab"

Rick Shapiro recently posted an informative blog on the powers of "Wiihab." It utilizes the Nintendo Wii gaming system as a tool for individuals suffering serious injuries.

Check out the Wiihab injury rehab blog here.

Read More About The Power of "Wiihab"...

back to top

Fatal Car Accident on I-664

Jim Lewis wrote about a tragic car accident where a man lost control of his vehicle and died on I-664 in Chesapeake, Virginia.

Learn more about this terrible car accident

Read More About Fatal Car Accident on I-664...

back to top

Norfolk Southern Unveils Zero-Emission Locomotive

The Virginia-based Norfolk Southern debuted a prototype locomotive which runs on batteries. You read that right - a rail train that runs on re-chargeable batteries.

The NS 999 is an all-electric plug-in locomotive which uses a lead-acid energy storage system featuring over one thousand 12-volt batteries.

"Today, the transportation sector currently accounts for just under a third of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, more than half of nitrogen oxide emissions, and almost three-quarters of our petroleum consumption," said Transportation Secretary LaHood in a Norfolk Southern statement. "We need to change that. By working together to develop alternative energy sources and innovative technologies like this electric locomotive, we will make transportation more sustainable and energy-efficient."

Is this the future of locomotive technology? Maybe. However, we must keep in mind that building this prototype was expensive. Nevertheless, it's a great advancement and sends the right signal to other railroad companies that energy-efficient rail trains are the future of the industry.

I only wish that the big railroads paid  as much attention to worker safety on locomotive cabs. For example, the seats for train crews in the engines are often terrible, with no back support, and lead to back and neck injuries to engineers and conductors over time through vibration and lateral movement, shocking and jolting the workers. We see lots of railroad  workers hurt this way over their careers and ending up with spine problems and surgery making it impossible to return to the job.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton is a law firm which focuses on injury and accident law and we have experience handling FELA and general railroad injury cases. Check out our case results to see for yourself. Our primary office in based in Virginia Beach, Virginia (VA). Our lawyers hold licenses in NC, SC, WV, KY and DC and have handled hundreds of railroad injury and FELA cases. We would like to send you one of our FREE reports about railroad injury and FELA cases, including the Do's and Don'ts When Injured at a Railroad - The Railroad Workers FELA Rights and What Railroad Claim Agents Agents Won't Tell You (But You Must Know). We are ready to talk to you by phone right now-we provide free initial confidential injury case consultations, so call us toll free at 1-800-752-0042. Our injury attorneys also host an extensive injury law video library on Youtube . Furthermore, our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard and Norfolk Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service.

PA


Read More About Norfolk Southern Unveils Zero-Emission Locomotive...

back to top

Advice on Ethics when Handling Auto Injury Cases

John Cooper shares his extensive legal knowledge regarding ethical issues in auto injury cases. John has been practicing personal injury law for over 20 years and has attained the highest lawyer rating (AV) from Martindale-Hubbell.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our injury attorneys host an extensive injury law video library on Youtube . In addition, our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

Read More About Advice on Ethics when Handling Auto Injury Cases...

back to top

Virginia Beach Bar Association’s (VBBA’s) Upcoming Seminar to be Presented by the Attorneys of Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton

Jim Lewis, John Cooper and Rick Shapiro will be presenting a seminar "How to Handle a 
Personal Injury Case from Intake to Verdict" on October 15, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. at the
Contemporary Art Center with a social to follow. 
 
VBBA Members - No Charge                   Non-members - $50.00

Name_________________________________________________

Firm__________________________________________________

Telephone____________________   Email____________________

Please make checks payable to Virginia Beach Bar Association and mail with registration
to 2425 Nimmo Parkway, Virginia Beach, VA  23456, or fax to 385-2156.  For further
information \call 385-2155.

The Virginia Beach Bar Association was founded in 1957 to promote justice.
 
About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers, and also hosts a YouTube injury law video library with over 50 videos covering many FAQ’s on personal injury subjects at http://www.youtube.com/user/hsinjurylaw.  Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Virginia Beach Officer Who Strongly Supported DUI Laws Found Breaking One Himself

Drinking and driving is a serious offense not only in Virginia (VA), but in all other states across the US.  We hear tragic stories everyday about car accidents and deaths that involve drunk driving.  When police officers take a special focus on fighting against DUI offenses, we often look at them as a hero.  However, what happens if the person you thought was trying to prevent drunk driving was actually doing some himself.


Police
 reported that an officer, who specializes in enforcing the drunk-driving laws, was arrested for driving under the influence on June 20th.  The arrest occurred after two officers reported to a crash at 2 a.m.  Luckily, no one was injured in the accident. 


The officer who was arrested for drunk driving was the same officer who arrested former NFL star Bruce Smith for the same charges in May.  The officer has been on the force since 2002 and made 70 drunk driving arrests in 2007.  He was also awarded a Lifesaving Medal for saving an infant who was choking.  He has been aboard the carrier Theodore Roosevelt to teach sailors about the dangers of drunk driving.  To promote safety in the community, the officer helped with a city program that allowed individuals who had been drinking to retrieve a note form officers to leave on their car so it does not get towed. 


The officer was released on a $500 bond and has been assigned to handle administrative duties.  He has hired an attorney to represent him during trial.


Ab
out the Editors:
Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Motorcycle Accident Claims the Life of Young Sailor

On the 500 block of Helmick St. in Norfolk, VA, 22 year old sailor Phillip A. Bailey lost his life in a motorcycle accident. The victim was found around 1:00 a.m. lying a few feet from his bike. He was transported to a hospital, but he died of his injuries there around 4:00 a.m.  Police never determined the actual time of the accident, but they were able to rule out alcohol as a factor. The investigators did conclude that speed was a factor to the death of this young man.

It is always tragic to hear about unfortunate incidents such as these.  As a friend to someone who recently received their motorcycle license, I hope that he as well as all other motorcyclists respect the speed limits, abstain from drinking and driving, and wear a helmet while riding. These three simple acts could save their lives, if they find themselves in a motorcycle accident. As we saw in the case above, a simple act of speeding on such an exposed vehicle can have disastrous consequences.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Bariatric Surgery: Safer Than You Think

Obesity remains a major cause of illness and death in the United States.  It has spread to all areas of our population, including the young and the old.

 

One of the ways the medical community has developed to address this very serious health problem is through the use of what is known as bariatric surgery.  There are several types of bariatric surgery, but all of them have one primary goal, which is to drastically reduce the size of the stomach, thereby involuntarily reducing the amount of food that the surgical recipient can put into his or her stomach at any one time.  This can be accomplished by surgically reconfiguring the digestive tract, known as a Roux-N-Y gastric bypass surgery.  The other method that enjoys the most popularity as this time is the laparoscopic application of a band that is placed around the stomach and constricted to divide the stomach into two sections, one of which cannot accommodate food.


In a recent report of the
American Journal of Medicine, a large perspective study was reported in which the post-operative complications associated with these two types of bariatric surgery were studied and statistically tabulated.


The major adverse outcomes which were encountered and studied were death, blood clots and perforations to portions of the digestive tract, causing
sepsis. 


The results of the study were that a surprisingly few number of patients who underwent one of these two types of procedures had severe or serious post-operative complications such as death, blood clotting and perforation of portions of the digestive system, such as stomach perforation and bowel perforation.  The study concludes that because of the low number of major adverse outcomes following either of these two types of surgery, surgical intervention for a severely obese individual should be seriously considered when weighed against the adverse effects that morbid obesity has on the health of the untreated patient.


Ab
out the Editors:
Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Lawsuits Filed in Last Month’s Metro Disaster in Washington, D.C.

According to an article in today’s Washington Post, the first lawsuits have been filed stemming from the deadly Metro train crash in Washington, D.C. last month.  The litigation could take years and cost tens of millions of dollars if negligence is proved.  Attorney John Cooper of our law firm told the Post that “The subway system has such a deep pocket, there’s no reason to go beyond.”  To read more about the potential liability of Metro and what else John had to say about the train wreck, please click here.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

John Cooper Featured in Virginian Pilot Business Section

Attorney John Cooper was featured in Sunday, July 5, 2009’s business section in the Virginian Pilot.  John has been appointed to serve as designated legal counsel for the Transportation Communications International Union, a major railroad worker’s union.  John has been a personal injury attorney for 20 years and 12 of those years have been spent working on railroad-related cases.  Half of John’s work is railroad-related and the other half is general personal injury like car wrecks and premises liability.  For more information on John’s appointment to the TCIU, please click here.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

back to top

Move-Over Law is a Trap for Drivers

The Virginia Lawyers Weekly recently wrote an article about the move-over law.  Virginia's move-over law instructs drivers to move over or reduce speed for stopped emergency vehicles.  The law itself does not say anything about slowing down.  Instead the Virginia Code § 46.2-921.1 requires that drivers change lanes if possible unless it would be "unreasonable or unsafe".  In such case, the motorist must proceed with due caution and maintain a safe speed for highway conditions.  A violation of this statute carries a possible jail sentence.  Recently, a Fairfax County man was ticketed in a state police operation specifically targeting violators of the move-over law.  According to the man's attorney, his client was driving on the right lane of Interstate 95 on a Sunday morning when he spotted a trooper on the shoulder with lights flashing.  The driver was concerned about traffic in the left lane and did not move over.  Instead, he slowed down and passed the stopped police car with caution.  The man was stopped and charged with violation of the move-over law.  This law carries a possible 12-month jail sentence and $2,500.00 fine.  The man was allowed to take a driver's safety class as to avoid a conviction.  Nevertheless, his attorney said that case signals that slowing down is not enough to avoid a ticket despite the language on the highway signs around the state.  According to the man's attorney, the trooper did not disagree that the sign was wrong.  The Virginia State Police’s spokesman said the signs posted by VDOT put a link there are advisories to the motoring public warning drivers that there is such a law in the commonwealth.


The Virginia State Police's written response notes that the headline of the code section reads drivers to yield right-of-way or reduce speed when approaching stationary emergency vehicles on highways.  The state code however states that headlines of code sections are mere catch words and do not become part of the statute.


The attorney also acknowledges that the move-over law addresses a real problem for law enforcement and others using emergency vehicles.  Anyone standing beside a broken down car on a 55-mile-an-hour highway knows the danger police must confront to enforce traffic laws on the highways.  We all know most cars are doing at least 70 and some are paying attention while most are distracted.  According to a March 29 Virginia State Police news release, 18 law enforcement personnel were struck and killed nation wide in 2008 while standing outside of their vehicles.  Virginia is one of 40 states with a move-over law.


If you are ever on the interstate and notice that there are emergency personnel stopped or responding to a scene, do your best to move over with caution to avoid any other accidents.  That is the intent of this law however it does seem that the law is poorly written and requires some clarification.


Ab
out the Editors:
Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Virginia Head-on Collision Causes Brain Injury and Headaches

Driving at night often adds an additional danger to the roadways for drivers in Virginia (VA).  Although people usually take precautions when driving in the dark by using headlights and paying close attention to the surroundings, other drivers on the road may not be acting as safely.  

 

A brain injury case, arising from a head-on vehicle crash, reached a settlement of $242, 500 recently in Charlottesville, Virginia.  The plaintiff was heading down the US 250 bypass at night when a car, heading in the other direction, jumped the median, crossed over two lanes, and hit her head-on.  Photos of the victim’s car showed that the damages were extensive.

 

After the accident, the injured lady was taken to the University of Virginia hospital where records show she had a number of injuries including a “closed head injury,” a fractured leg, and stiffness in the neck.  The emergency personnel noted that the injured individual was disoriented, confused about the place, time, and month.  Additionally, the plaintiff suffered both a concussion and amnesia and spent six weeks in a cast to heal her broken leg.  Repairs were also made to a tooth which was injured in the collision. 

 

The plaintiff, because she was experiencing constant headaches, visited a neurologist who conducted an EEG.  The results of the EEG showed that the head pain was a result of “irregular theta activity” in the left hemisphere of her brain which was connected to the bruising she received in the car accident.  More specifically, the neurologist argued that the plaintiff was suffering an injury to her left temporal lobe.  The plaintiff underwent acupuncture treatment for headache relief.  Although the headaches were soothed by the treatment, they would return when it ended.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Malfunctioning Lift Gate Blamed for Severe Injury to Leg

Virginia (VA) accident lawyers achieved a good result to help a worker get a recovery from a negligent party in a recent case.  On March 5th, 2009, a settlement of $700,000 was reached in a case involving defective equipmentThe injured employee, while on the job, in Roanoke County, was moving a drapery cart that weighed about 1,200 pounds.  In order for workers to move the heavy item, the company hired a “city van.”  After the man believed the cart was in proper position on the gate on the van, he gave the operator the go ahead to lower it.  According to expert opinion, the gate, which is supposed to lower at about 6 inches per second, took only a second to fall.  The rapid fall of the gate caused the cart to crush the right leg, breaking both the leg bone and ankle. 


Air transport brought the victim from the local hospital to VCU Medical Center.  As time passed, after the accident, the leg injury continued to grow worse.  The worker’s shattered leg made him permanently disabled. 


The defendant’s attorney contended that there was no problem with the gate but that they had inappropriately positioned the cart.  The insurance company eventually offered a fair settlement.


Ab
out the Editors:
Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury lawfirm (VA-NC law offices) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

FELA Injury Lawyer, John Cooper, Tapped to Serve as Designated Legal Counsel for Rail Union

The Transportation Communications International Union (TCIU) has appointed John Cooper of Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton to serve as one of its designated legal counsel.  This high honor appoints the law firm to serve the members of this major, national railroad workers’ union whose membership includes carmen, train car inspectors, clerks, and Amtrak coach cleaners.  The Virginia Beach FELA attorneys of Shapiro, Cooper regularly help railroad families when a worker or loved one gets hurt in an accident on the job or elsewhere.  The TCIU has representation for all of the major railroad freight carriers including Norfolk Southern (NS) and CSXT.  Only a select few lawyers and law firms are chosen to serve as DLC for this railroad union.  “I look forward to serving the TCIU railroad workers and their families,” said John Cooper.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury lawfirm (VA-NC law offices ) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Injury Law Rules are Different in Virginia, Maryland and D.C. as it Relates to the Metro Train Collision Victims

As an experienced lawyer handling injury cases and wrongful death against railroads including Metro commuter train systems, I know what a big difference the choice of the appropriate court can make.  In essence, the rules that would relate to a case can be different depending upon where the accident happened, i.e. was it still within Washington, D.C. as opposed to across the line of the District in the State of Maryland (MD).  My understanding of the facts in the Metro train crash disaster is that it did occur within Washington, D.C. which is good because the rules that pertain to people who get hurt in the District of Columbia are in some ways more favorable than the rules that pertain in northern Virginia (VA) or Maryland.


For example, Maryland has caps on how much non-economic damages a person can get regardless of their injury for pain and suffering, anguish, scarring, disfigurement, and future psychological and emotional problems as a result of being in a train wreck.  Likewise, Virginia has caps on punitive damages which would be money beyond the compensation to the individual person hurt in the collision to punish the
Metro rail administration for recklessly endangering the public in a way that showed a conscious disregard for the rights and safety of commuters, tourists, and passengers.  I don’t know yet whether the facts will warrant an award of punitive damages against the people who ran the system, but there are certainly indications that they had been told that this 1000 series train was outdated and did not have all of the safety features that should be used, including things that would make it more crashworthy in the event of a rear-end collision just like what happened in this case.


Accordingly, if you or a loved one was hurt in this catastrophe, you want to hire not just a lawyer who specializes in injury trial work, but someone who knows how to handle cases which may involve different states and properly choosing the best courthouse to file any lawsuit.


Ab
out the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal
injury lawfirm (VA-NC law offices ) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Location of Metro Train Disaster Familiar to Our D.C. Area Injury Lawyers

The Washington and Maryland areas where the two D.C. commuter trains wrecked on Monday are well known to Rick Shapiro, our senior partner, whose practice has focused on train and railroad accidents for well over a decade.  Rick graduated from the University of Maryland at College Park, not far from the scene of the disaster and close to the home town of one of the people who died in the wreck, Hyattsville, MD.


Rick and our law firm have regularly handled cases in the courts in Washington, D.C.  His D.C. trial experience has particularly involved working on behalf of Amtrak employees hurt on the job.


John Cooper, another of the lawyers at our firm focusing on train crashes, handled several of the cases on behalf of people injured in the 1996 MARC train derailment where the Maryland commuter line hit an Amtrak train in the Silver Spring area.  John tried to jury verdict one of those cases on behalf of a passenger in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in the Greenbelt Division.  We stand ready to meet with any of the victims of this current Metro train crash or their families.  Please call us toll free at 1-800-752-0042 if we can help you or answer any questions.


Ab
out the Editors:
Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal My injury law firm (VA-NC law offices ) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

I-264 Crash Stops Traffic and Sends Man to the Hospital

According to an article in the Virginian Pilot, a recent multiple vehicle crash on Interstate 264 near the Virginia Beach-Norfolk line stopped traffic for about 90 minutes.  At around 6:30 p.m., Virginia State Police investigated an accident.  The accident involved a Ford SUV near the exit of Woodstock and Newtown Road.  The driver of the SUV attempted to cross four lanes of eastbound traffic, struck a pickup truck and lost control.  His vehicle then hit another vehicle in the HOV lane and went airborne over the concrete median barrier.  The SUV landed on the westbound side of I-264.

 

The SUV driver, a 20-year old Suffolk man, was flown to Norfolk General Hospital with multiple injuries.  Both sides of I-264 were closed until 8:00 p.m.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices ) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Chinese Drywall Being Used to Build Chesapeake, Virginia (VA) Hotel

In an article by Mike Saewitz from The Virginian Pilot, Chinese drywall was being used in the construction of a Chesapeake Comfort Inn & Suites hotel located in the 3300 block of South Military Highway. The drywall was found on March 26th during a routine inspection, and the city is demanding its removal from the hotel project. A criminal summons has been issued to Dilip Patel, the developer of the hotel, accusing Patel of violating state building codes. Patel told city officials that he would test the drywall and remove it if it was found to be defective. Patel has until June 24th to prove that the drywall is not defective or to remove it entirely, otherwise the developer will have to appear in court to face the charges.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices ) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Sailboats Strike Overhead Power Lines in Chesapeake, Virginia (VA)

Several sailboats have become entangled in overhead power lines in St. Julian’s Creek in Chesapeake, VA. Four vessels have struck the power lines in the last 7 years and 2 of those have caught fire and sunk, resulting in injuries and one fatality (2007). According to the Virginian Pilot, the most recent of these accidents took place in September of 2008. Fortunately, Dominion Virginia Power—the company who owns the lines—was able to shut off the line and no one was injured.

 

Apparently, the sailboats were following the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) northbound and became confused after passing through the Gilmerton Bridge, thinking that St. Julian’s Creek was a continuation of the ICW. The vessels’ masts then became entangled in the overhead power lines that hang 45ft above the creek. Following these incidents, a warning daybeacon has been placed near the creek and signs have been posted warning boaters of the low hanging lines. However, many local boaters wonder if these precautions will be enough to prevent future accidents.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices ) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Railroad Accident in Milwaukee Injures Two People

According to a newspaper article that appeared in The Virginian Pilot, a train in Milwaukee collided with a vehicle that was stopped on railroad tracks at a grade crossing on Monday, May 25th. The accident occurred when the driver of a van, 40-year old Monica Ensley-Partenfelder, along with her 2-year old son got stuck on the tracks. It was reported that the husband of the family was traveling in a separate vehicle and came to the aid of his wife and son along with a police officer, John Krahn, 41. Together, they rescued the two from the vehicle. However, as the train struck the van, the vehicle was then thrown into the rescuers. While the wife and boy did not sustain injuries, police officer John Krahn and husband Scott Partenfelder, 47, were rushed into emergency surgery and are still in the hospital. John Krahn was reported to be in satisfactory condition following surgery and Scott Partenfelder remains in critical condition.

 

Our firm in Virginia Beach, VA, has seen many cases where a car gets trapped in front of a locomotive. Sometimes the car stalls, and sometimes defects in the crossing of the railroad and the street pin the vehicle. Too often death or serious injuries result to the motor vehicle’s driver or passengers. Our area has lots of potentially dangerous grade crossings of Norfolk Southern in Norfolk and Chesapeake, of CSX in Portsmouth and Suffolk, and of Amtrak in Newport News.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices ) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Should Virginia (VA) Emergency Vehicle Law be Revised?

When a cop causes a car accident with injury or death on a Virginia road, their insurer and employer can be sued by the victim for negligence or gross negligence in some circumstances. According to an article by Dena Potter from The Associated Press, a recent tragic accident has led to discussion of revising emergency vehicle law in Virginia. Ashley McIntosh, age 33, was killed in February of 2008 when a police officer sped through a red light striking McIntosh’s vehicle. Police officer, Amanda Perry had received a call regarding a shoplifter shortly before, and was responding to that call when she went through the intersection with her lights flashing, but her siren off. According to Virginia traffic regulations, police officers are not required to obey traffic laws concerning running red lights and speeding if they use their flashing lights and sirens “as may be reasonably necessary.” Due to the wording of this phrase, police officer Amanda Perry, was found not guilty of reckless driving. However, the Police Department investigated Amanda Perry’s involvement in the incident and recommended suspension and a transfer. Officer Amanda Perry ultimately decided to resign from the Police Department in March and is also facing a lawsuit from the victim’s family.

 

The mother of the deceased, Cindy Colasanto, approached the Virginia State Crime Commission asking the commission if they would support Senator Linda Puller’s new bill aimed at altering the law so that police officers and emergency vehicles would be required to use both flashing lights and sirens, unless there was a reason that would make it necessary that they should not. The Virginia State Crime Commission is scheduled to vote on whether or not to recommend revision of the law in December. The need for public safety of innocent bystanders must be given some weight in emergency police response practices.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices ) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Virginia (VA) Jury Awards $7.5 Million in Failure to Diagnose Breast Cancer Case

A great result in a medical negligence case was recently achieved in the Spotsylvania Circuit Court of Virginia in a wrongful death case about a doctor’s error in treatment. According to an article that appeared in Virginia Lawyers Weekly, a jury awarded $7.5 million to the husband of a registered nurse who died from breast cancer. Eleanor Browder had noticed a lump in her breast and had gone to see her family practitioner from Lee’s Hill Medical Associates in May 2003. The family practitioner, Dr. Donna Gamache, had ordered a mammogram that came back negative, but did not refer Mrs. Browder to a specialist for further testing. After 7 months the lump had more than doubled its size and Mrs. Browder went back to Dr. Gamache, who then referred her to a specialist. Following further testing, the mass in Mrs. Browder’s breast was found to be malignant. 

After the cancer was discovered, Mrs. Browder had to have a bilateral mastectomy followed by chemotherapy and radiation treatment sessions before her cancer finally went into remission. Two years later, the cancer metastasized and she died at 57 in April of 2008. William Artz, an attorney located in Arlington, Virginia represented Mrs. Browder claiming that Dr. Gamache along with a nurse practitioner were negligent when they did not initially seek further testing to investigate the abnormal mass. Attorneys representing Dr. Gamache and Lee’s Hill Medical Associates (really their insurers) claim that Mrs. Browder’s outcome could not have been changed. They maintained the position that the delay in her diagnosis would not have had an effect on her chances of survival due to the aggressive nature of the cancer. The jury was in deliberation for 5 and ½ hours before awarding Mrs. Browder’s husband $7.5 million dollars. Under Virginia medical malpractice law, the wrongful death award will be reduced to the amount of the applicable cap allowed, likely under $2 million dollars.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm (VA-NC law offices ) edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono service to consumers. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY, who handle car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.

back to top

Railroad Stocks Up, Helps Workers?

 Authored By:  John M. Cooper, Esquire        

 

         The New York Times (June, 2008) is reporting that railroad stocks are on the rise despite the turbulent market.

 

            Major railroad stocks like CSX (whose shares are up 50%), based in Jacksonville Florida, and Union Pacific (up more than 30%) can credit the upward trend to their exposure to coal and grains, both of which are also doing very well in the market. Transportation analysts say that railroads have been improving their business for years. Rising fuel prices haven’t impacted railroads as much as trucking companies and other transportation sectors because of railroads’ use of diesel as opposed to gas and their ability to transport more tons per gallon of fuel than for instance trucking companies.

 

            Locally, here in Hampton Roads, Virginia (VA), Norfolk-based Norfolk Southern’s stock has risen 35%, though it is one of the least popular major rails, according to the Times, due to its relatively higher reliance on the declining auto and housing construction sectors.  Kirekeby, a railroad analyst at S&P, says he expects Norfolk Southern to “benefit from rising coal exports, which have increased since the dollar has fallen against the euro.”

 

            As a FELA attorney representing railroad workers, I always wonder if more money for the corporations will benefit the average carman or railroad clerk.  The railroads still treat workers who get hurt on the job poorly, it seems, regardless of the economics of the rail industry.

 

back to top

Wood County WV Doctor Sued For Infant Wrongful Death

According to the West Virginia Record, a mother is suing both a doctor and a medical staffing company for the wrongful death of her infant girl in January of 2007.

The mother, Sara Norman, of Parkersburg, lost her baby, Lainey McKenzee Alexis Norman, to a bowel obstruction after the emergency room doctor, Dr. Andrew Hughes, allegedly missed the baby's vital diagnosis and did not offer the correct treatment or care. Norman filed a wrongful death claim against the doctor and the doctor's employer, Best Practices, Inc., in Wood County Circuit Court in West Virginia.

When Norman brought her daughter to Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital, the baby was vomiting bile, not eating, and acting lethargic. Dr. Hughes conducted an x-ray and stomach ultrasound, but found no problems and released the baby without treatment.

As her baby's condition worsened, Norman returned to the hospital, where another doctor examined the child and quickly diagnosed sepsis due to a bowel obstruction. At this point, the baby was rushed by ambulance to Ruby Memorial Hospital in Morgantown, WV, where she underwent a number of surgeries. At that point, however, her bowel was not able to be save and her other internal organs began to shut down. She died less than a week after Dr. Hughes examined her.

Norman's medical malpractice and wrongful death attorney is arguing that Dr. Hughes was negligent in correctly treating Norman's baby, based on the fact that he did not diagnose the child correctly despite several common warning signs and the fact that he did not seek the opinion of another doctor in the emergency room.

Norman is seeking unspecified damages in her wrongful death lawsuit.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.


Read More About Wood County WV Doctor Sued For Infant Wrongful Death...

back to top

Tanker Driver At Fault For Truck Accident On Dulles Greenway in VA

The Loudoun Times-Mirror reported that charges have been filed against the truck driver allegedly responsible for a serious accident on the Dulles Greenway (also known as Route 267) on January 26. Tanker driver Richard Clem, 24, of Middletown, was charged with one count of reckless driving according to the Virginia State Police.

The accident occurred at 2 a.m. at the 3.2-mile marker near Shreve Mill Road, when Clem's tanker truck ran off the left side of the westbound road in rolled over in the median. The tanker was carrying 7,500 gallons of diesel fuel, which spilled onto the roadway and shut down multiple lanes of Dulles Greenway for a number of hours during clean-up between Leesburg and Ashburn. The lanes were re-opened by midday on Monday.

Two eastbound lanes reportedly reopened about 7:30 a.m, according to the WJZ Virginia Wire. All westbound lanes reopened about 9:30 a.m. The far left eastbound lane and median remain closed as hazardous materials teams work to clear the area. Many local commuters were advised to find new routs to work for the day due to lane closures and delays.

Authorities do no know how much of the 7,500 gallons leaked onto the median and roadway, but guess that the clean-up involved hundreds of gallons of fuel. An official from Loudoun County reported that the spill, though hazardous to the environment, posed no threat to the public.

Clem was taken to the Inova Loudon Hospital by ambulance for minor, non-life-threatening injuries. In the meantime, Loudoun County Fire and Rescue sent hazardous material personnel to control the accident scene and clear the spill. They were joined by a private hazardous materials clean-up company to contain the damage.

Police added that fatigue was a factor in the truck accident, as is the case with a number of truck accidents.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.


Read More About Tanker Driver At Fault For Truck Accident On Dulles Greenway in VA...

back to top

West Virginia Family Files Medical Malpractice Suit For Woman’s High Blood Pressure Death

In 2006, Pamela Campbell Smith of West Virginia was rushed to the emergency room with symptoms of high blood pressure and a possible heart attack - most notably nausea, vomiting, and headache. Emergency room doctor M. Anwar Abdeen treated the patient for pain and nausea and then sent her home in a wheelchair.

Later that night, her daughter, Tiffany Neil, called the emergency room again with information that her mother was not improving and was unresponsive. The ER nurse told the daughter that her mother should "sleep it off." By 3 a.m., Campbell smith was dead from high blood pressure.

What followed Campbell Smith's death was confusing to the family - mysterious notes were sent in the mail about the circumstance of her death, the doctor blamed the nurses, the hospital, Montgomery General Hospital, blamed the doctor, who they had disciplined in the past and who was let go from the hospital after the incident.

Montgomery General Hospital had been on notice before that night that Dr. Abdeen was not doing an acceptable job at his post in the emergency room before Campbell Smith was admitted - and before joining the staff of the hospital, two former employers had reported problems with his work. A wrongful death claim was settled privately while he was working at Mountain Emergency Physicians, and a Huntington medical center for veterans also found him to be threat to the health and safety of their patients.

Now, Campbell Smith's family is arguing that the hospital knew that Dr. Abdeen was not qualified to help their mother and is suing for legal costs, punitive damages, and compensation.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

Read More About West Virginia Family Files Medical Malpractice Suit For Woman’s High Blood Pressure Death...

back to top

Maryland State Delegate’s Son Killed On Motorcycle By Big Rig

According to The Baltimore Sun, 23-year-old Ryan Myers, the son of Maryland State Delegate LeRoy Myers, was killed in a motorcycle accident that involved with a tractor-trailer in Washington County, Maryland, late on Thursday afternoon shortly after 5:30 p.m. Police think that motorcycle speeding may have been a factor in the fatal motorcycle accident.

Myers was riding his motorcycle on Md. 63, just north of I-70, allegedly speeding. When a big rig pulled out from a truck stop parking lot and into his path heading north, driven by 62-year-old Larry Garrett, Myers skid on his bike for 300 feet and into the path of the truck. The left side of the truck ran over the man's legs. He was pronounced dead at the scene of the motorcycle accident.

Myers was riding a 2001 Yamaha motorcycle, while the truck driver was driing a 2007 Kenworth 18-wheeler.

"No one knows the pain that a family goes through at a time like this," the Myers family released in a statement. "Ryan was a precious son that only wanted to please."

The investigation is ongoing, and no charges have been filed. A viewing and funeral for Ryan Myers will be held next week at the Tri-State Fellowship Church. The family asks that in lieu of flowers, mourners can make memorial donations to Grace Academy, a school in Hagerstown, Maryland.  

Read More About Maryland State Delegate’s Son Killed On Motorcycle By Big Rig...

back to top

Stricter Bus Accident Penalties Fail In West Virginia Legislature

This year, West Virginia Legislature Delegate Kelli Sobonya of Cabell, WV, sponsored a bill that would have dole out harsher punishments to those who cause bus accidents. However, the bill failed in the House Finance Committee. A similar bill calling for tougher penalties for those who didn't stop for school buses died in the House Education Committee last year.

The bill's major proponent is Linda McCarthy Bailey, a Lincoln County grandmother who lost her granddaughter, 6-year-old Haven Brooke McCarthy in December 2007 when she tried to cross the street after getting off the bus. The driver of the car in that case, Sylvia Martin, saw the flashing lights of the school bus' stop sign that allows children to cross the road safely, but did not understand that she was supposed to stop.

Martin was found guilty of misdemeanor negligent homicide and was sentenced to six months of house arrest that ends in May of this year.

The failed law, know as "Haven's Bill," would have made being at fault for a school bus accident injury punishable by up to three years in prison, plus fines. Being at fault for a school bus accident death would be up to ten years in jail plus fines. Both crimes would have been considered felonies.

"I figured it was a no-brainer, and it was going to be passed," Bailey said. "I'm not sure why it didn't get looked at. It will next time. None of this is going to do anything for my granddaughter because she's dead. Through her death, I hoped something positive could come out of it."

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

Read More About Stricter Bus Accident Penalties Fail In West Virginia Legislature...

back to top

Virginia Pilot Demands That Dangerous Doctors Be Disciplined

An opinion piece that appeared in the Virginia Pilot on March 13 continues their investigation of the Virginia medical malpractice system and the issues that Virginia officials face in pinpointing the dangerous doctors in the state and revoking or suspending their licenses.

The piece puts forth that the Virginia Board of Medicine has not been thoroughly examined in ten years and that negligent and dangerous doctors are slipping through the cracks for months and years before being found and disciplined. Although two different investigations have found problems with the state's ability to discover and punish medical malpractice doctors, appropriate reforms have not taken place.

The first review came in 1999, when the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) found that the Virginia Board of Medicine was not protecting patients from bad doctors in a timely or efficient manner. In 2003, the Virginia General Assembly pass reforms to help fix the bad system, but problems not only didn't disappear - they got worse. In the last five years since the changes were made, fewer dangerous doctors were stopped from practicing, not more.

This year, a review by consumer watchdog Public Citizen ranked Virginia 39th in the nation when it came to disciplining medical malpractice doctors.

One example involves Dr. Julian McKenny Junior, who was put on probation until further notice after his inappropriate and unmonitored painkiller prescriptions resulted in the alleged overdoses of two of his patients.

In another case, Dr. Mohammad Soori was caught prescribing painkillers to five patients without medical reasons and having unprofessional relationships with two other patients. His license was suspended in January.

The Virginia Pilot suggests making peer reviews by doctors a requirement, as well as making pharmacists report suspicious prescription activity by doctors to medical board officials. The paper also suggests a simple self-examination within JLARC concerning why their disciplinary rates are so much lower than the majority of other states.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

Read More About Virginia Pilot Demands That Dangerous Doctors Be Disciplined...

back to top

Obama Administration Eyes Medical Malpractice System

As President Barack Obama and the new administration looks towards national health care reform, making changes to the federal medical malpractice system may be in store. The changes would greatly affect Virginia medical malpractice lawyers, Virginia doctors, and those in Virginia who have suffered from medical malpractice and are seeking compensation.

Lobbyists representing trial lawyers across the country argue that medical malpractice payments are a drop in the bucket in comparison to other costs and that trying medical malpractice cases saves patients' lives by keeping dangerous and negligent doctors out of hospitals and operating rooms. They also come carrying frightening statistics: the Institute of Medicine reports that almost 100,000 deaths each year in the United States are the result of medical malpractice.

On the other hand, some argue that medical malpractice caps on pain and suffering payments could save the government as much as $4.3 billion in the next ten years. However, everyone seems to agree that doctors and hospitals need to improve the quality of their care - the disagreement comes in finding the best way to do so.

Obama has entered the conversation by saying that medical liability issues would be a prime place to look to save money in the next few years.

One of the greatest issues seems to be "defensive medicine," in which doctors go to extra, expensive lengths to prevent being sued for medical malpractice by ordering large numbers of diagnostic tests or prescribing unneeded medicine.

A change that seems likely may involve alternative dispute resolution - a program that may encourage patients to negotiate compensation outside of the courts. Another idea that has been floated involves a medical-specific court in which judges have greater medical knowledge. Those on both sides of the medical malpractice debate seem to think that alternate solutions to medical malpractice lawsuits would be beneficial.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

Read More About Obama Administration Eyes Medical Malpractice System...

back to top

WV Medical Malpractice Doctor John King Has Bankruptcy Denied

The West Virginia Gazette out of Charleston reports that WV medical malpractice doctor John King is in the news again this month - this time for getting his federal bankruptcy request denied in court.

King, who is infamous for a staggering 124 medical malpractice claims in just seven months of working at Putnam General Hospital, is now prevented from using a bankruptcy filing to protect him from the dozens of lawsuits and medical malpractice claims brought to him by former patients.

Federal bankruptcy Judge Thomas Bennett announced that King had been hiding an estimated $670,000 from the court in a secret account. When he filed for bankruptcy, the negligent doctor claimed his Volo has his single asset - valued at $500.

It was also revealed that King may owe roughly $1 million in taxes to the IRS.

Putnam General Hospital has already paid out $100 million to the 124 patients of King, who have accused King of a number of medical malpractice incidents, including the overprescription of drugs and cause of unneeded pain.

Still more medical malpractice lawsuits are pending. John King has already had his medical license revoked in a number of other states before he practiced in West Virginia. In another state, he was also accused of causing multiple patients to overdose on painkillers that he prescribed to them.

King lacks board certification in any specialty by either the American Osteopathic Association or the American Medical Association. He also showed that he was incompetent in three separate residency programs and in several staff reviews.

He still holds medical licenses in New York, Tennessee, and Florida - his medical license has been revoked in Pennsylvania, Alabama, and Texas. King also has a history of suing both the hospitals that suspend his practicing privileges as well as the lawyers that have represented him in a number of medical malpractice cases.

Read More About WV Medical Malpractice Doctor John King Has Bankruptcy Denied...

back to top

Virginia Mom Sues For $5 Million After Inmate Son Dies From Bad Medical Care

According to the Virginia-Pilot Online, the mother of a jail inmate is suing a health care company after her son died while incarcerated.

Marvette Norman believes that the death of her son would not have occurred if not for the negligent care of Correct Care Solutions - the health care company that looks after the medical needs of the inmates at Norfolk City Jail. She has filed a $5 million lawsuit concerning the death of her son.

Twenty-year-old Laquan Norman died a year ago - in March 2008. Norman had complained to prison officials of a number of medical problems for a week - including blood in his nose, mouth, and urine. Near the end of the week, the prisoner began to vomit blood.

A nurse with Correct Care Solutions detected blood in the prisoner's urine and noted that the young man should see a doctor. However, no appointment was made. Norman lost consciousness while jailed and later died in the hospital. An autopsy revealed that he died of a cerebral hemorrhage stemming from a blood disorder.

Jail officials thought meningitis might have been a cause, though the medical exam ruled that cause out. It is not clear why the man would have been examined by the health care company but never referred to a doctor or hospital.

The medical examiner who conducted the autopsy stated that the death could have possibly been prevented had the patient sought medical care and was diagnosed with the blood platelet problem earlier. His mother has filed a wrongful death lawsuit.

Laquan was in jail due to a drug possession charge and a trespassing charge. He had been incarcerated since June of 2007 and was set to be released in July of 2008.

Read More About Virginia Mom Sues For $5 Million After Inmate Son Dies From Bad Medical Care...

back to top

Study Finds Virginia Least Likely To Discipline Medical Malpractice Doctors

The Virginia Pilot Online reports that Virginia continues to lag behind other states when it comes to patient safety, medical malpractice, and disciplining dangerous doctors and nurses. Ten years ago, an investigation revealed that Virginia often took years to strip the licenses of practicing doctors leaving a path of medical malpractice incidents behind them. Now, another national study has concluded that Virginia still suffers from medical malpractice management problems, especially related to taking fast disciplinary actions that could save lives.

The level of concern in VA has risen along with the recent publicity surrounding rheumatologist Dr. Stephen Plotnick, who may be responsible for up to ten untimely patient deaths. Seven of the deaths are related to drug overdoses based on prescriptions given to them by the doctor.

Although Plotnick's license was revoked recently for a two-year period, and although the medical malpractice doctor has agreed to stop treating patients with chronic pain, it took the Medical Board of Virginia five years to take action. Patients who could have been saved died.

Part of the issue may be Virginia's complaint-based system of medical malpractice reporting. Especially because it is hard to for anyone to see patterns of multiple complaints toward one doctor or medical practitioner. Even though the Virginia General Assembly passed a package of medical malpractice reforms in 2003, the problem remains, as illustrated by Plotnick's negligent path of destruction. In fact, there is less disciplinary action taken against doctors than there was before the reforms passed.

Many agree that if peer doctors more readily turned in other doctors who they suspected of medical malpractice, conditions would improve. But many doctors are skittish about turning over coworkers or colleagues. The system would improve further, many critics think, if pharmacists also reported suspicious doctors.

William Harp, the director of the Board of Medicine in Virginia, has suggested a peer review board, along with a generally more aggressive stance toward the small number of dangerous and negligent doctors.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.


Read More About Study Finds Virginia Least Likely To Discipline Medical Malpractice Doctors...

back to top

Red Light Running May Slow Down Avoiding Virginia Beach Accidents

As an injury lawyer practicing in Virginia Beach, Virginia (VA),  I was glad to see that the city is bringing back the red light cameras at big intersections which will reduce car crashes by 40 percent according to the Virginia Beach Police Department.  Drivers at big intersections like Virginia Beach Boulevard and Independence Boulevard will get a citation for not obeying the traffic signal just based upon a camera taking a picture of the license plate under the new system.  The idea is to promote safety on the roads by getting people to obey the red light.  It may also provide information useful when we have an insurance case against a driver who runs the red light at these intersections, to prove that they did in fact fail to stop where they should have.  This could be invaluable in a lawsuit for serious injury or wrongful death in Virginia Beach where the case would otherwise be a he said/she said as to who had the red light.  It provides an electronic eye witness to show that the at-fault driver did in fact drive dangerously. 

          The intersections where these are going in, in addition to the one mentioned above which is in the Pembroke area in the new town center part of Virginia Beach, include the following:

 

1.         Indian River Road and Kempsville Road

 

2.         Holland Road at Rosemont Road

 

3.         Indian River Road at Military Highway

 

4.         General Booth Boulevard at Dam Neck Road

 

5.         Princess Anne Road at Lynnhaven Parkway

 

6.         Princess Anne Road at Dam Neck Road

 

7.         Virginia Beach Boulevard at Great Neck Road and London Bridge Road

 

8.         Independence Boulevard at Bonnie Road and Euclid Road

 

When a similar system was tested for some two years in 2004 and 2005, a nine-month period resulted in 17,000 tickets being issued.  That is an amazing number of red light violators in Virginia Beach posing a menace to everyone else on the road.

 

            Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the Northeast North Carolina (NC) border, practicing primarily in the southeastern U.S. and handles only injury law, including car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. The firm's website is: hsinjurylaw.com, the firm edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, as well as the Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard and also hosts a video library covering many FAQ’s on personal injury subjects. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

back to top

South Carolina Illegal Employee Workers’ Comp Bill Faces Delays, Critics

Forbes.com reports on a new bill that would restrict the workers' compensation rights of those who are not legal citizens employed in the United States. The proposed bill would make the laws surrounding illegal immigrant rights in South Carolina even tougher than they already historically have been.

In the bill, which was debated by a judiciary subcommittee this week, would allow foreign workers to have medical costs covered but would not protect them or their families if they were injured or killed on the job.

"We can be nannies. We can be translators. ... We build houses. We build hospitals," said Diana Salazar, president of the Latino Association of Charleston. "But we cannot get benefits if we get hurt on the job because we don't have a piece of paper? ... I think it's unfair."

The bill comes just months after a bill that ensured that employers checked their workers' citizenships before hiring. Some opponents of the bill worry that the law would encourage companies to hire illegal citizens in order to save themselves from making settlements with those hurt or killed on the job - with foreign workers, companies could stop worry so much about a safe work environment or about being sued for being negligent. In addition, the bill could hurt the state's health care systems - with doctor's offices and hospitals left with large, unpaid bills created by unsafe working conditions paired with a lack of benefits for employees.

Insurance companies, on the other hand, are supporting the bill. They stand to pay less money out on claims.

Hispanic workers in South Carolina are already more likely to be killed or injured on the job, and South Carolina has the highest death rate for Hispanic workers in the country. Some of these problems stem from the types of jobs that illegal workers are hired for, while other problems stem from language barriers and English literacy issues.

Read More About South Carolina Illegal Employee Workers’ Comp Bill Faces Delays, Critics...

back to top

Virginia Lawmakers Stop Bill That Would Help Workers With Traumatic Brain Injuries

The Virginia Committee on Commerce and Labor has shot down a law that would expand the workers' compensation coverage for those who suffered traumatic brain injuries on the job, but cannot remember the accident due to the ensuing brain injury.

The bill, S.B. 821, was brought about after the case of Arthur Pierce, a truck company employee who allegedly suffered a head injury on the job, but could not remember what happened to him because of his concussion. The man was found lying next to his truck in 2006 and although he can no longer communicate what happened to him or why, it is assumed that he fell from his big rig and hit his head. Medical doctors agreed that the accident was most likely caused by a work accident, but since there were no witnesses, his family's plea for workers' comp benefits was rejected. Even the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission denied the benefits since no one was able to confirm that his accident was an on-the-job injury.

Pierce died from his injuries in 2008 after two years of around-the-clock caretaking.

The bill would make logic sense because of a similar law on the books in Virginia that states that if an employee is found dead on the job or near his or her work site, it can be presumed that the worked died because of his job unless there is a significant amount of evidence saying otherwise.

The reason for the bill's rejection was a likely increase in workers' compensation fraud, according to the committee members who blocked the bill's progress. It would be too easy, they said for workers to fake a traumatic brain injury if they did not need witnesses. Basic testimony, or other evidence to prove their case.

The bill was brought by republican senator Richard Stewart of Westmoreland County.

Read More About Virginia Lawmakers Stop Bill That Would Help Workers With Traumatic Brain Injuries...

back to top

Peanut Food Poisoning Hurts NC Peanut Farmers

The recent salmonella outbreak across the country was due to tainted peanuts and peanut products - bad news for North Carolina peanut farmers. Although the normal annual demand for peanuts is 100 tons in the United States, peanut farmers are seeing a stalling market due to the fear and anxiety attached to the rash of food poisonings in the last month.

In 43 states, 486 people were struck down by the bacteria-laden peanut products. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) also reports 107 hospitalizations as well as eight deaths - with numbers expected to rise as more victims come forward. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recalled a number of peanut products, but although many store brands have been declared safe, many are still wary of peanut products. Those affected for the most part ate peanut butter prepared in institutional settings - schools, hospitals, and nursing homes. Food banks especially have been harmed by the crisis, with many organizations throwing out thousands of pounds of food products out so as to prevent any further illness or death and so as to avoid any consequential litigation involving negligence and food poisoning.

The President of the North Carolina Peanut Growers' Association told the media that contracts were only trickling in for the coming year - a bad sign for farmers. The situation is complicated by the troubled peanut market - although sales were up by 40 percent last year, farming costs are rising for the crop while prices are dropping.

"I think people will become more comfortable (with peanut purchases) as time goes on, but with every farming enterprise, you can't just sit around and wait," he said. "We've got economic enterprises that must move on from year to year."

North Carolina is the fifth largest peanut producer in the country as well as the largest producer of the larger "ballpark peanuts."

The peanut outbreak was traced to a peanut processing plant in Georgia. Since the beginning of the outbreak, 2,100 peanut products have been recalled by over 200 different companies.

If you have suffered a serious injury from food poisoning, it is vital for you to contact a specialized attorney for more information about your case.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.


Read More About Peanut Food Poisoning Hurts NC Peanut Farmers...

back to top

Mason County Records Second Fatal Car And Truck Accident in 2009 On US 35

The Point Pleasant Register in West Virginia reported that a second fatal accident occurred in Mason County in as many weeks. This fatal car and truck wreck took place around 6:30 in the evening on Tuesday. The highway was closed for four hours in the wake of the car accident. The West Virginia Police are still investigating the details of the case.

The accident took place on US Highway 35, when 44-year-old Stanley Gray of Putnam County hit a deer on the road and lost control of his vehicle. His eastbound sedan crossed over the double-yellow centerline and into the westbound path of a Volvo big rig driven by 49-year-old Evon Gray. The tractor trailer, owned by Swift Transportation, Inc. hit the PT Cruiser head on.

The 18-wheeler ran off the road while the Cruiser bounced back into the eastbound lanes where it was hit a final time by a pickup truck driven by Charles Ellis of Pliny, WV.

Stanley Gray was killed on the scene and taken to the Pleasant Valley Hospital morgue, while the other two drivers were not seriously injured.

The second fatal accident in 2009 happened on January 21, when a car carrying three men was involved in a single-vehicle accident on Sand Hill Road in Point Pleasant. Two of the men were pronounced dead at the scene of the crash, while a third man was airlifted to St. Mary's Medical Center with serious, life-threatening injuries.

Officials say the three men were celebrating one of the men's 21st birthday and that alcohol may have been a factor in the crash. The West Virginia State Police said that the investigation was ongoing and that charges were pending.

In a third and final serious accident in Mason County, Jessica Durst, 21, and Jarrod Donohew, 27, both of Leon, West Virginia, were involved in a two car accident on State Route 62. The head-on wreck took place when Donohew tried to pass another vehicle and struck Durst's vehicle. Both were airlifted to the Cabell Huntington Hospital, where both are recovering from serious injuries.

Read More About Mason County Records Second Fatal Car And Truck Accident in 2009 On US 35...

back to top

Three Die In Freak Boating Accident Near Myrtle Beach; Boy In Serious Condition

A tragic and fatal boating accident took place at Murrells Inlet on Wednesday night, taking the lives of three family members and leaving one boy in critical condition. The boat capsized on the Waccamaw River about ten feet from the shore of Sandy Island - six people were aboard the 14-foot boat when it went over, though no one aboard was wearing life jackets. Witnesses say the boat took water at the bow and then capsized, although the exact reason for the boat accident remains unclear.

The victims included 47-year-old Lou Ann Robinson, her 19-year-old daughter Shaquatia Robinson, and her nephew, 18-year-old Rishard Pyatt. Pyatt was a senior at Waccamaw High School.

Another passenger and the driver of the boat, Tiffany Tucker, along with her five-year-old daughter survived the accident and called for help. Baby Zyair Smalls was found by rescuers floating on a boat seat cushion among the wreckage. He remains in critical condition at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, SC. The water at the time of the accident was 50 degrees, and the one-year-old boy was airlifted to safety by rescuers. Reports are that they baby's condition is improving despite the fact that he nearly drown.

South Carolina state law requires that children under 12 wear life jackets at all times while on the river. The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources said that the accident is still under investigation and that it is not clear whether or not charges will be filed.

"At some point, we will make that decision, whether there will be any charges," McCullough said. "Who would be charged would be the person operating the boat."

Officials are still trying to locate the boat, and the search for the vessel will continue over the next few days. Autopsies confirmed that the cause of death of the three victims was drowning.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

Read More About Three Die In Freak Boating Accident Near Myrtle Beach; Boy In Serious Condition...

back to top

Airplane Crashes Near Ohio Home Killing One

The Associated Press has reported that on December 21, 2008 a small airplane hit a flag pole and crashed on the front lawn of a vacant Ohio home, killing the pilot.  The crash sparked a fire that damaged the garage of the house which was in foreclosure.  No one on the ground suffered personal injuries.  There were no passengers in the airplane that crashed, a Piper Saratoga.  Airport spokespersons said the pilot was attempting to land at Akron-Canton Airport which is about two miles from the house where the airplane accident occurred.

The plane went down in a residential neighborhood surrounded by farm land.  Early reports indicate that the airplane that crashed took off from somewhere in Pennsylvania.  Witnesses told officials that they heard what sounded like an engine sputtering before the airplane crash. 

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the accident.  Its report is not due for several months.

Airplane/aircraft accidents like these highlight the need for experienced aircraft/airplane/aviation attorneys.  Our Virginia based aviation accident attorneys have the experience necessary to find the truth and obtain maximum compensation for personal injury/wrongful death victims of airplane crashes, whether in Virginia (VA), North Carolina (NC) or beyond.  Contact us immediately as evidence must be secured, investigated and analyzed quickly before it is destroyed, changed or altered forever.

 

Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia practicing primarily in the southeastern U.S. and handles only injury law, including car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.  The firm's website is: hsinjurylaw.com, the firm edits two injury law blogs:  Virginia Beach Injuryboard & Norfolk Injuryboard, and also hosts a video library covering many FAQ’s on personal injury subjects.

back to top

Recovery of Colorado Airplane Crash Victims Delayed Until the Spring

On New Year’s Eve of 2008, the Associated Press reported that the bodies of a Canadian couple killed in an airplane crash in the Colorado mountains won’t be recovered until spring because of treacherous weather and avalanche threats.  Costilla County officials say that the 67 year-old pilot and his 65 year-old wife are presumed dead in the December 20th airplane accidental crash at
Vermejo Peak.  Sheriff’s Office officials say the aircraft crash wreckage is more than 1,000 feet higher than expected.  That peak received more than a foot of snow last week. 

Experienced aircraft accident/crash attorneys are frequently needed to answer the many questions that arise when an airplane accidentally crashes and results in wrongful death.  Our aircraft accident/crash attorneys provide excellent service to families and loved ones of those who are victims of aircraft crashes and accidents resulting in wrongful death. 

In order to prove negligence in a airplane/aircraft case, it is crucial to have personal injury attorneys/lawyers that have both knowledge of the field and real trial experience and one of our lawyers is himself a licensed pilot. The Virginia/Carolina Law Firm of Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis and Appleton routinely confer with some of the foremost medical experts in the country on behalf of their clients, and have a long and distinguished history of taking cases to trial with successful results. If you or a loved one has been the victim of a airplane/airline accidental injury, please send us a quick contact form or call us toll free for a free consultation today.

Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia practicing primarily in the southeastern U.S. and handles only injury law, including car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.  The firm's website is: hsinjurylaw.com, the firm edits two injury law blogs:  Virginia Beach Injuryboard & Norfolk Injuryboard, and also hosts a video library covering many FAQ’s on personal injury subjects.

back to top

Medicare Doles Out Poor Ratings For Many Of West Virginia Nursing Homes

A new five-star rating system for West Virginia's 130 nursing homes and adult care facilities finds that the majority of the state's adult homes are below average. The West Virginia Gazette reported that the first results from December's Nursing Home Compare Program are not ideal.

While 12 of the homes received a five star, much above average rating, 34 homes received one star - a much below average rating. Just over half of West Virginia's nursing homes, 50.8 percent, were either much below average or below average.

In general, for-profit nursing homes scored poorly, with national chains snagging 20 of the 34 poorest ratings. Non-profit facilities fared better.

"Our goal in developing this unprecedented quality rating system is to provide families a straightforward assessment of nursing home quality, with meaningful distinctions between high and low-performing homes," acting CMS Administrator Kerry Weems said in December.

Although the program has released nursing home rating in the past, this is the first year that the five-star system has been implemented so that consumers can more easily differentiate between their choices for quality care.

Predictably, the administrators of the five-star nursing homes were pleased by the list, while the others were dissatisfied. Jesse Samples, the director of the West Virginia Health Care Association, called the data used for the rating "flawed and incomplete" and suggested that nursing homes were too different and complex to compare fairly to one another.

The rating system is based on staff-to-patient ratios, state inspection results, patient safety, environmental safety, and health-quality measurements that track statistics such as the percentage of patients suffering from UTIs, other infections, and bedsores.

Critics of the rating system say that they would like to see other types of factors included, such as patient satisfaction, daily activities, home atmosphere, and special services. However, Nursing Home Compare said that those factors are easily covered in a visit to a nursing home, while their survey strives to collect information that visitors cannot see on the surface.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

Read More About Medicare Doles Out Poor Ratings For Many Of West Virginia Nursing Homes...

back to top

Knightdale, NC, Woman Injured In Train Collision On Rarely Used Track

According to the East Wake News, a woman from Knightdale, North Carolina, was driving her vehicle on Friday, January 16, when a train hit her. The accident was partially caused by the fact that the railroad tracks in question had rarely been used until recently and many in the area were not used to being cautious when driving on the tracks.

The car, which was driven by Nathalie Frazier of Pampus Lane in Knightdale, North Carolina, was stopped on the tracks at the intersection of First Avenue and Fayetteville Street. While she was looking at traffic approaching from the left on First Avenue, the train approached her car from the right and Frazier was unaware of its approach.

The oncoming train was a two-engine, 21-car Coastal Carolina locomotive, blew its warning whistle but was unable to stop. It struck Frazier's 2007 Honda on its right broad side and dragged the vehicle along the track for 560 feet before it was able to come to a stop. The train speed limit along that particular stretch of track is 25 miles per hour.

Acting Police Chief D.R. Simmons told the media that Frazier was transported by ambulance to WakeMed, but miraculously did not receive any life-threatening injuries. She was released later that day.

The General Manager of Coastal Carolina, Virgil Holman, explained further that trains had been rare in the area until last year, when the company began leasing the track section from Norfolk Southern in June of 2007. Prior to the lease, Norfolk Southern did not use the tracks actively but instead used them for storing engines not in use between Wilson NC, and Raleigh NC. Even now, trains run rarely - hauling sporadic loads of agricultural goods such as corn, woodchips, soybeans, and wheat.

This story is a cautionary tale - even if you think train tracks are not in use, never assume that there isn't a train approaching.

Read More About Knightdale, NC, Woman Injured In Train Collision On Rarely Used Track...

back to top

Wrongful Death Claims Settled in Two Sago Mine Disaster Cases in West Virginia

The West Virginia Gazette reports that two more Sago Mine Disaster families have settled their lawsuits, although the details of the settlements were not released - court records in the Kanawha Circuit Courthouse only give basic facts of the settlements.

The two miners, both of whom died in the accident in Buckhannon, were Fred Ware and Marty Bennett. The company that settled the lawsuit was ICG subsidiary Wolf Run Mining. These are the fourth and fifth settlements to take place since the incident took place two years ago. Six other wrongful death cases are still pending with the mining company.

There are a number of other confidential settlements involving the families of the mine explosion victims and other involved companies tied with ICG.

The incident took place on January 2, 2006, when an underground explosion trapped thirteen miners in a tunnel in the Sago Mine. An investigation revealed that a lightening strike was the most likely cause of the explosion. One man, Terry Helms, died soon after the initial blast from carbon monoxide poisoning, while 12 other men waited, trapped, for rescuers. Almost two days after the blast, 11 or the 12 men were dead, with only Randal McCLoy Junior still breathing at the time of the rescue. It was the worst mining disaster in West Virginia since 1968, and the worst mining accident in the United States since 2001, when 12 miners died in Alabama.

To this point, the lawsuits have centered around numerous safety violations prior to the explosion, the lack of any anti-lightening equipment, and poorly-functioning seals. There were also not enough emergency oxygen packs that were working - a safety precaution that could have saved lives.

"We will vigorous defend ourselves against the remaining complaints," the company said in last year's annual report.

The Sago mine closed permanently after the incident.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.


Read More About Wrongful Death Claims Settled in Two Sago Mine Disaster Cases in West Virginia...

back to top

Virginia’s Peanut Corporation Of America Faces First Wrongful Death Lawsuit After Salmonella Outbreak

MarketWatch has reported that Virginia's Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) has been hit with its first wrongful death lawsuit in regards to the recent outbreaks of salmonella poisoning from peanut products.

The first lawsuit involves the death of nursing home woman, 72-year-old Shirley Mae Almer, who ate a peanut butter product that was delivered to the adult care facility by King Nut Companies. The heir of Almer, Jeffery Almer, has filed suit against both the Virginia-based Peanut Corporation of America and King Nut Company. A five-pound pail of King Nut peanut butter was found in the nursing home that had been recalled by the FDA in connection with the salmonella outbreak.

Jeffery Almer's lawyer is arguing that Shirley Mae Almer's death on December 21 was the direct result of the illness she contracted from the peanut butter. The recall was not announced by PCA and the Federal Food and Drug Administration until January 13 - and by that time, more than 500 people around the country had become ill from the salmonella. Forty-three states were affected by the outbreak, including Virginia.

"This is a very large and significant recall," the lawyer said. "It points to a number of vulnerabilities in our food safety system that require legislation and funding to correct. Consumers should feel concerned and demand a significant overhaul."

The prosecution's argument is that both companies were negligent in training and supervising their employees to prevent such breeches in safety. In addition, the two peanut companies were negligent in their failure to maintain safe conditions for their products and properly test products.

The peanut processing plant is also currently involved in a criminal probe for the salmonella outbreak. In the past, PCA plants have been found to be unsanitary and products have been found to be contaminated. The FDA also stated that national brands of peanut butter are safe to eat.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

Read More About Virginia’s Peanut Corporation Of America Faces First Wrongful Death Lawsuit After Salmonella Outbreak...

back to top

Norfolk Southern Railroad Cuts Costs, Can Safety Cuts Be Far Behind?

            In a December 2008 edition of the Norfolk, Virginia (VA) based paper, The Virginian Pilot, the business section reported that Norfolk Southern Railroad (NS) was cutting costs by reducing the number of workers and other measures aimed to keep corporate profits and stock prices high.  These railroad company layoffs can have a serious effect on worker injuries and the safety of the public grade crossings.  Norfolk Southern Railroad currently has about 30,000 railroad workers and employees across its system spanning the eastern United States.  The workers at Norfolk Southern, which swallowed up much of the old Conrail Railroad system a decade ago, include crafts such as locomotive engineers, conductors, Carmen, signalmen, trackmen, laborers, and machine operators.  Already in recent years you have seen reductions in railroad work forces that have been drastic.  For example, train crews that operate the locomotives and railcars going down the railroad tracks in the past had three, four, or five people per train.  Now the same jobs are done by two man crews and with the use of remote control devices, even one-man crews.  This work force reduction puts extraordinary pressure on the one or two people left operating these huge machines.  It is inevitable that with this short staffing there are going to be more injuries to railroad workers resulting in FELA claims and disability to individual workers.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

 

 

 

back to top

Emergency Department Bills Injured Texas Woman For Nothing But Delay!

In a recent new report in a Dallas, Texas newspaper, it was reported that a 29 year-old lady suffered a serious personal injury when she broke her leg back in September of 2008.  As a result of this serious personal injury, she went to her local Emergency Department to have her broken leg treated by the Emergency Room doctor. 

 

She was placed in the waiting room and went untreated for 19 hours.  Finally, she left in disgust and went to a different Emergency Department.

Much to her surprise, two weeks later she received a bill for $162.00 from the Emergency Department that offered her no treatment.  She stood up for her patient rights and refused to pay this bill from the Emergency Department that failed to treat her.

 

If you have received serious personal injuries, it is always important to seek medical attention promptly.  However, if the medical facility you report to does not treat your serious personal injury quickly, you should seek alternative treatment.  You may also want to see an experienced personal injury lawyer if you get this kind of treatment from a health care facility, especially if the lack of prompt medical care leads to clear worsened injuries or permanent damages.

Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia practicing primarily in the southeastern U.S. and handles only injury law, including car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. The firm's website is: hsinjurylaw.com, the firm edits two injury law blogs: Virginia Beach Injuryboard & Norfolk Injuryboard, and also hosts a video library covering many FAQ’s on personal injury subjects.

 

 

 

 


back to top

Pilot in Fatal Airplane Fire Crash Warned Superiors of High Winds

 A factual aviation crash report issued by the National Transportation Safety Board concludes that a pilot killed this spring in an aircraft crash, while fighting a fire in Fort Carson, Colorado, repeatedly warned officials that winds were too high and strong, but was urged by officials to push on.  The pilot was killed April 15, 2008 when his single engine air tanker nosedived and crashed into the ground.  The NTSB airplane/aircraft crash report relating to the pilot’s death was released during December, 2008.

 

The pilot who was killed in this airplane crash flew a single engine air tanker for an aviation company that contracted with the Department of Defense for fire-fighting.  The report notes that the pilot had indicated to dispatchers that he did not want to head to the Fort Carson fire if winds were stronger than 23 m.p.h.  The actual wind speed there was reported to be gusting to approximately 38 m.p.h.  As the pilot approached the fire, he lost control of his aircraft causing the airplane to crash, causing the wrongful death of the pilot.

 

Airplane/aircraft accidents like these highlight the need for experienced aircraft/airplane/aviation attorneys.  Our Virginia based aviation accident attorneys have the experience necessary to find the truth and obtain maximum compensation for personal injury/wrongful death victims of airplane crashes, whether in Virginia (VA), North Carolina (NC) or beyond.  Contact us immediately as evidence must be secured, investigated and analyzed quickly before it is destroyed, changed or altered forever.


Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia practicing primarily in the southeastern U.S. and handles only injury law, including car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.  The firm's website is: hsinjurylaw.com, the firm edits two injury law blogs:  Virginia Beach Injuryboard & Norfolk Injuryboard, and also hosts a video library covering many FAQ’s on personal injury subjects.

back to top

How Railroads Try To Pay Workers Less on Railroad Case Verdicts by Claiming an Offset for Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) Disability Benefits

The new strategy for railroads in railroad worker personal injury cases (FELA cases), is to try to reduce the sums juries are requiring them to pay by filing legal motions that  ask judges to give them a "setoff" or "credit" for the amount of money the railroad has paid to the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) for the employer's portion of  RRB  Tier II benefits (paid in the past by the railroad to the RRB).  Since early in the 20th century, Social Security and RRB benefits have been what is known as "collateral sources" of income/benefits which courts have felt were earned by the employee and paid to the employee for reasons unrelated to any personal injury lawsuits-where the worker sues the railroad for a persona injury at work (FELA/Federal Employers Liability Act suits).  Since the worker earned the RRB benefits through years of
faithful service to the railroad company, and also contributed to a portion of the RRB benefits personally through payroll deductions and since the worker would then qualify for the benefits based upon his or her age and physical condition, regardless of whether a lawsuit had been filed, courts felt it would be unfair for juries to consider the worker's RRB benefits' due to a work related injury. 

Despite over 60 years of court decisions holding that the amount of money a jury awarded an injured railroad worker should not be reduced by the worker's receipt (or even qualification for) RRB benefits, the
railroads are currently trying to get courts to ignore this precedent and reduce railroad worker  jury verdicts by the amount of money the railroad  contributed to the railroad worker's RRB pension.

We recently won a case for a 60 year old maintenance of way rail worker in North Carolina.  After the jury returned the verdict in our favor, CSX filed a motion asking the judge to reduce the jury verdict by
over $7,000.00 which was the sum our client received in RRB Tier II benefits while he was receiving an occupational disability (due to the same accident).  After both sides submitted briefs to the judge and
appeared at a hearing, the judge granted CSX's motion and reduced our client's jury verdict/recovery as the railroad had asked. 

Needless to say, we quickly appealed to the North Carolina (NC) Court of Appeals and after numerous briefs and oral argument, the North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed the trial court judge,  deciding that
our client's verdict had been inappropriately reduced by the trial judge.

LEGAL BRIEF EXCERPTS RELATING TO RRB SET-OFF CLAIM BY RAILROADS


Is a railroad defendant entitled to a set off against adverse jury verdicts based on the plaintiff’s receipt of an occupational disability pension funded in part by the railroad’s contribution to the Tier II portion of the employee’s Railroad Retirement benefits? Because the railroads contribute a larger portion (85 percent) to the Tier II benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) than the employee, are those benefits no longer a “collateral source” and a proper basis for set off? Does an injured railroad employee enjoy an improper “windfall” by receiving a verdict that provides compensation for past wage loss as well as Railroad Retirement benefits occupational disability annuity benefits when the Railroad Retirement benefits, which are primarily paid for by the defendant railroad, provide a second recovery for past wages lost during a portion of the time considered by the jury?  The proper response to all of these questions is “no”; however, railroads are making a concerted effort to convince trial and appellate courts the answers should be “yes.” The defense of set off is being aggressively pursued by railroads in Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) claims. The arguments advanced in support of set off by the railroads are based on the 1974 Congressional reorganization of funding under the RRA, which resulted in the current two tiers of Railroad Retirement benefits.

Railroads argue they contribute a much larger share (85 percent) to the Tier II benefits than the employee under the 1974 Act. Consequently, the Tier II benefits are no longer “a collateral source” and “replicate a private pension plan” which entitles them to a set off for the portion they have contributed to the Tier II fund during the employee’s receipt of an occupational disability pension under the RRA. The reorganization of the RRA in 1974 is a “red herring” and should not be recognized as a basis for any set off based upon the language of the FELA and the federal common law prohibiting set off in such situations.

Statutory Prohibition of Set off

     The passage of the FELA, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq., has been recognized as an “avowed departure” from the rules of common law, including defenses. The FELA provides for the defense of set off in very limited circumstances:

Any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which shall be to enable any common carrier to exempt itself from any liability created by this chapter, shall to that extent be void: Provided, That [sic] in any action brought against such common carrier under or by virtue of any provision of this act, such common carrier may set off therein any sum it has contributed or paid to any insurance, relief benefit, or indemnity that may have been paid to the injured employee or the person entitled thereto on account of the injury or death for which said action was brought.


     Courts have uniformly held that disability and retirement pensions under the RRA do not qualify for set off under 45 U.S.C. § 55 because the payments are not made “on account of death or injury.” The purpose of the RRA is to provide annuity, pension, and death benefits to railroad employees. As a social tax system, its purpose has never been to indemnify railroads from legal liability. Absent the purpose of indemnification from legal liabilities, pension payments made under the Railroad Retirement System should not be set off against a plaintiff’s damages.

     The railroad employee’s entitlement to a Railroad Retirement Board occupational disability is based upon years of service and a “physical or mental condition” that prevents the employee from engaging in any regular railroad occupation. There is no requirement that the disability arise from an on duty injury or due to the employer’s negligence. Thus, there is no justification for a set off due to the employee’s receipt of such benefits.

     The Supreme Court opinion in Eichel v. New York Central Railroad Co., which characterizes Railroad Retirement benefits as “collateral source,” relies in part upon an analysis of the interplay of the Railroad Retirement benefits and the remedies afforded by the FELA as discussed in New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. v. Leary. The Leary analysis was embraced by the Supreme Court in Eichel with regards to the FELA, but not the RRA.

     In its analysis in Leary, the First Circuit clearly reasoned that set offs for Railroad Retirement benefits were not authorized by the FELA:

We think these age and service requirements for disability payments remove those payments from the coverage of § 55 of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Accident indemnity strictly speaking does not seem to be within the Congressional intent discussed in the Retirement Act of 1937. Thus, this is not a set off authorized by § 55 because we think the retirement fund is not an ‘insurance, relief benefit, or indemnity’ within the meaning of that section. ¼ The retirement fund is supported by tax collections from the employer and employee, and to a limited extent by the general public. The benefits received under such a system of social legislation are not directly attributable to the contributions of the employer, so they cannot be considered in mitigation of the damages caused by the employer.

     There is no statutory justification for the award of a set off to a defendant railroad based upon an injured employee’s receipt of Railroad Retirement Board benefits.  To the contrary, courts interpreting the FELA have applied rules of strict statutory construction and limited remedies available under the RRA to those explicitly identified in the statute, thereby excluding a set off in this context. 

 
The Character and Nature of Railroad Retirement Benefits Prohibit Set off

     The railroads’ argument that the funds they contribute to the Railroad Retirement benefits on behalf of employees are not from a “collateral source” misses a very basic consideration uniformly recognized by courts applying the collateral source rule. “[C]ourts have been virtually unanimous in their refusal to make the source of funding the determining factor in deciding whether fringe benefits should be considered as emanating from the employer or a ‘collateral source.’”Based upon the character of the Railroad Retirement benefit contributions (paid regardless of source of disability) and nature (funding is mandatory under statute and contributed to by employer and employee), courts which have previously considered whether Railroad Retirement benefits are subject to set off against FELA verdicts have consistently prohibited such a set off. The earliest consideration of a motion by a railroad for an offset against a FELA verdict for sums paid into the Railroad Retirement benefits appears to be McCarthy v. Palmer.

     The court in McCarthy denied the railroad’s request for an offset, holding that the Railroad Retirement benefits received by the employee were excluded from offset under the collateral source rule. The court in McCarthy based its application of the collateral source rule to the employee’s Railroad Retirement benefits on the fact that the benefits were based upon the employee’s age and the benefits were payable to the employee regardless of the cause of his disability. The court stated that “there is not nexus between the purpose for which the contributions in this regard were made and the purpose for which damages in this negligence action are awarded.”

     A similar motion was also denied in Hetrick v. Reading Co., in which the court explained its evaluation of the legal basis for such a motion for offset balanced against the legislative purpose of the FELA and RRA. In denying the railroad’s motion, the court stated:

     The objects of the two pieces of legislation are entirely foreign to each other, and we are of the view that there never was a legislative intent that a jury giving consideration to the last named elements [perceiving loss in diminished earning capacity and pain and suffering in FELA awards] was to draw into its calculations the annuities provided for by the Retirement Act so that payments made by the employer under the latter legislation would be returned to it. Under these circumstances we do not feel that the annuity was ever intended to restore injured employees to a theoretical status quo, but on the contrary was intended to make secure in society those employees suffering injury after thirty years of service, or perhaps because of thirty years of service. Recovery under the Liability Act in such case is beside the point, because that is an attempted restorative alone.

 
     While federal courts have allowed set offs to defendants based on fringe benefits a plaintiff has received which are unrelated to service to the defendant or nonvested in the plaintiff, the same courts have protected plaintiffs from the defendants attempts to obtain set offs from funds which have vested with the plaintiff independent of the underlying cause of action. For example, the courts allowed the federal government to offset a Federal Tort Claim Act (FTCA) verdict with a portion of the plaintiff’s veteran’s benefits in U.S. v. Brooks. However, the courts denied the federal government a set off in a later FTCA claim against the plaintiff’s Civil Service Retirement Act benefits after distinguishing between gratuitous benefits (subject to set off) and compulsory benefit programs involving contributions from employers and employees (not subject to set off).The decision handed down in Price v. U.S. by the federal district court is particularly relevant to the consideration of set off and explicitly rejects the applicability of the earlier opinion of Brooks to fringe benefit plans in which contributions are made by the plaintiff and are mandatory. The district court in Price noted that Brooks involved only “certain veteran’s benefits which are, without exception, deemed to be gratuities which the Government may withdraw or modify at will as the recipient has no property or vested right in such benefits.” Price on the other hand involved a claim for an offset by the U.S. government against the plaintiff’s recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act against Price’s receipt of disability benefits under the Civil Service Retirement Act of 1956.  The plan was compulsory for Price and funded by contributions from the government and the employee.  The court also noted there was no statutory authority for the set off.

     The district court held in Price that an employee purchased a substantial right in retirement plans through mandatory contributions and such plans were distinguishable from those without contributions by plaintiffs. The court concluded that the application of the Brooks holding was “dubious” in such cases.

     In dicta, the holding excluding Civil Service Retirement Act benefits from negligence set offs was analogized to, and came to include, RRA benefits:


The Civil Service Retirement Act, like the Railroad Retirement Act counterpart, is designed, with respect to its disability provisions ‘to protect against risk of permanent loss of earnings through disability¼.’ Congress, under the Civil Service Retirement Act, has seen fit to provide for a cessation of disability benefits upon certain conditions dependent upon the earnings of the party receiving such benefits. To require an advance credit by way of offset upon a judgment under the Federal Tort Claims Act would do violence to the social and economic security of all federal employees similarly situated.

      The appellate decision in Price affirmed the rationale of the district court in denying a set off to the U.S., specifically stating it is the nature and not the source of the benefits which determine the applicability of a set off.

     A similar result was handed down by the Indiana Court of Appeals recently which addresses the specific issue of the appropriateness of allowing a defendant railroad to offset an FELA verdict by Railroad Retirement benefits received by the injured employee in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Gardner. The Gardner court analyzed the basis of the defendant’s motion for offset (i.e., contribution to the RRA Fund), the nature of the collateral source rule, the nature of the funds, the accepted factors for determining the applicability of the collateral source rule, and concluded that a set off should not be granted in such a situation.

     The Gardner court identified five factors utilized by federal courts to determine whether payments are “fringe benefits” or the result of payments made by a tortfeasor intending to indemnify itself from future liability. The former is subject to the collateral source rule exclusion the latter is not. The five factors identified by the Gardner Court are:

(1) whether the employee makes any contribution to funding of the disability payment; (2) whether the plan arises as a result of a collective bargaining agreement; (3) whether the plan and payments there under cover both work related and non-work related injuries; (4) whether payments from the plan are contingent upon length of service of the employee; and (5) whether the plan contains any specific language contemplating a set-off of benefits received under the plan against a judgment received in a tort action.

 
     A
fter a detailed analysis of each of the above-mentioned factors (which the court concluded are all contrary to allowing offset), the court in Gardner concluded that due to the nature of Railroad Retirement benefits “setoff is not allowed under federal common law.”

     Once it reached the conclusion that set off of Railroad Retirement benefits is not appropriate under the federal law, the court analyzed whether there is any congressional intent for such a set off independent of, or contrary to, the federal common law.  After analyzing several cases from various federal circuits, the court concluded “[i]t is clear the Congress intended the RRA to further the public policy of protecting railroad employees who become disabled on or off the job, and not to protect or reduce the liability of a negligent employer” and rejected CSX’s motion for offset.

Conclusion

     Courts have uniformly held the source of funding should not be the determining factor when analyzing whether fringe benefits are from a “collateral source.” Efforts to justify set off regardless of the purpose of the fringe benefits sought to be set off should fail for the reasons discussed above: (1) statutory prohibition by 45 U.S.C. § 55; (2) federal common law; and (3) absence of legislative authority for such a defense.

     While the absence of legislative authority is specifically discussed in several of the cases referenced above, it is also supported by a common sense analysis of the facts that the railroads rely upon so heavily in making the pitch for a set off based on the 1974 reorganization of the RRA. The Eichel opinion holding Railroad Retirement benefits are from a collateral source for FELA purposes was handed down in 1963. The litany of cases holding set off was not supported by the RRA and prohibited under the FELA began with McCarthy in 1939. These decisions were presumably known to Congress, the railroads, and the unions at the time of the 1974 reorganization of the RRA, yet Congress did not provide for a set off in the language of the 1974 RRA. The absence of such statutory language demonstrates an absence of legislative intent for a set off in this context. 

     Additionally, the remedies available to the parties under the FELA have been strictly construed by the Supreme Court. Thus, recognizing the defense of set off based upon a plaintiff’s receipt of Railroad Retirement benefits would in essence be the enacting of legislation by the judiciary. There simply is no direct authority justifying the defense of set off in this setting. Plaintiffs should be prepared to aggressively and thoroughly contest such a defense through a demonstration of the overwhelming judicial and legislative authority contrary to the defendant’s arguments.

________ _____________ ____________

Our law firm has a long history of representing railroad  victims, including conductors, engineers, track maintenance, carman and all crafts, as well as those suffering wrongful death of family member due to railroad accidents/diseases/injuries.  Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia practicing primarily in the southeastern U.S. and handles only injury law, including car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases and more.  The firm's website is: www.hsinjurylaw.com , the firm edits two injury law blogs:  Virginia Beach Injuryboard & Norfolk Injuryboard, and also hosts a video library covering many FAQ’s on personal injury subjects.

back to top

Virginia/Carolina Personal Injury Lawyers Discuss Recent Personal Injury Case Verdict against Drunk Driver Including Punitive Damages

Virginia/Carolina Personal Injury Lawyers Discuss Recent Personal Injury Case Verdict against Drunk Driver Including Punitive Damages

Juries do not have sympathy for drunk drivers who cause serious personal injuries, whether in Virginia (VA), North Carolina (NC) or elsewhere. Even in a case of very small medical bills, a recent Virginia jury in a conservative state court jurisdiction granted a $281,000 verdict for a teenager injured in a car accident hit by a totally drunk driver with a .32% blood alcohol content (BAC).

The injured plaintiff was a high school student/cheerleader who was 16 years old at the time of the car accident. The drunk driver sideswiped a car, causing it to flip over, and then the drunk driver's car traveled across a wide median and collided head on with the teenager's car. Fortunately for the 16-year-old, her medical bills totaled only $760 mainly for chiropractor visits for back problems. The chiropractic care was mostly for pre--- existing scoliosis, but the chiropractor believed the scoliosis was made worse because of the car accident, and the teenager would need to have chiropractic care for years into the future, estimated at about $10,000 over time.

The defendant, who had blown a BAC of .32% was charged with his third driving under the influence conviction (DUI/DWI). He admitted drinking Wild Irish Rose all weekend at the time he was arrested.

 Although the teenager had less than $1000 of medical bills, witnesses testified about her fear of driving at night, and the mental impact the accident had on her, which had some impact on their ability to participate in some cheerleading and track at school.

 The plaintiff sought compensatory damages for her personal injuries, but in Virginia as in most states punitive damages can be claimed against a drunk driver. Punitive damages are punishment damages and are not connected directly to the victim's personal injuries, medical bills or lost wages. In inappropriate situations, where a defendant drunk driver’s conduct is outrageous, and in conscious disregard of safety, punitive damages may be granted by the jury .

The case was heard by a jury in Rockingham County Circuit Court, Virginia, known as a fairly conservative county. The jury awarded $80,000 for the personal injury, with only $764 in actual medical bills damages, and $200,000 in punitive damages, all against the drunk driver for a total verdict of $281,000. Naturally, the lawyer representing the drunk driver (likely an insurance lawyer) is trying to have the court set aside the verdict as inappropriate and excessive as of the time this article is drafted.

The defenses that a lawyer can make on behalf of an obviously drunk driver, or a drunk driver with repeat drunk driving/DUI/DWI convictions, are very limited in front of a jury. Our law firm handles only personal injury law, and in cases of an intoxicated driver or of alleged drunk driving, we have gained experience in investigating and locating the necessary evidence to prove drunk driving and intoxication in any civil personal injury case context.

back to top

Personal Injury Lawsuits: Hospitals and Clinics Adjust To Increase in Infection Injury Malpractice Cases

According to an article in Lawyers USA in December 2008, medical malpractice lawsuits are on the rise against hospital and other clinics for serious or life-threatening infections that personal injury victims are claiming could have been prevented.  Most importantly, juries are holding the hospitals responsible for failing to prevent the resulting infections.

 For example, the article referred to a November 6, 2008 jury verdict of $13.5 million to a Massachusetts woman who died of an infection caused by flesh-being bacteria after she underwent cancer treatment. The article referred to a November 14, 2008 confidential settlement in the sum of $16 million to a Utah woman, who alleged that the hospital in question failed to detect a flesh eating bacteria either before or after she gave birth and caused her to lose three limbs and several body organs. The article discussed a July, 2008 verdict for $2.58 million in favor of a Missouri couple after the husband contracted a deadly type of staph infection known as methicillin resistant staph  (MRSA), after doctors had put a pacemaker in. The particular patient lost a kidney and a leg and a foot had to be amputated.

 Many medical malpractice lawyers have refused to accept personal injury cases relating to infection contraction, because infection can be a known complication of most surgeries and procedures. However, where special circumstances can be shown that prove a hospital or clinic violate a specific standard of care directed to avoiding infection, it seems that juries are paying attention and penalizing hospitals for the careless or negligent conduct.

 For example, in late 2008 Medicare stopped reimbursing for certain types of hospital contracted infections.  The implication is that it can result from a hospital mistake, and Medicare may refuse payment.

 Perhaps more importantly, the Joint Commission  (The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, also called the JCAHO) , which is a nonprofit organization based in Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois,  evaluates end credits healthcare programs.  The JCAHO released a written document which outlines strategies for preventing infections. The extensive document was released in October 2008 and is very important because hospitals and clinics follow the recommendations of the joint commission and use it as a basis for many of the standards and actions they take. Also, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) also has rules for avoiding infections such as when an IV, intravenous device should be removed and how long one should be left in. Also, CDC rules specify that a surgeon should not perform a heart surgery while a remote site infection exists, as several examples of standards that apply to infections.

 Between the CDC recommendations, and the compendium released by the joint commission, the standard of care for preventing infection in hopitals and clinics is changing and it  is being recognized that the standards do exist for preventing infections. Active hand hygiene policies, screening incoming patients for certain types of infections, and a bunch of other recommendations now are relevant in any case where a personal injury medical malpractice lawyer is reviewing a case of a preventable infection that causes permanent and serious medical complications.


About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

back to top

Slip, Trip and Fall Personal Injury Cases: When Is A Hole Or a Condition Open and Obvious?

In a recent federal court decision out of Richmond, Virginia (within the Federal court circuit over West Virginia (WV), Virginia (VA), North Carolina (NC) and South Carolina (SC)  the federal judge denied a motion to dismiss a delivery driver's personal injury  lawsuit against a  Firestone  Tire store, though Firestone claimed that the delivery driver should have seen an open and obvious  pot hole in the parking lot. The issue of when a condition such as a hole or a pothole constitutes and open and obvious condition is one that often arises in personal injury lawsuits involving slips, trips and falls.  If a condition is “obvious” the establishment tries to get the suit dismissed prior to trial.

In the new decision, in a case called Cring v. BFS Retail and Commercial Operations LLC, the opinion by Judge Payne outlined the fact that under Virginia law courts are permitted to find contributory negligence on behalf of the injured victim when the hazard or condition was open and obvious, and with ordinary care, the condition/hole could have or should have been avoided by the injured person. Also, this particular decision noted that the Supreme Court of Virginia has specifically not decided, as a matter of law, that a pedestrian's failure to look down while stepping forward must always constitute contributory negligence on behalf of the injured person. The Virginia high court stated that a jury must examine the size, location and visibility of defects or conditions to determine whether they are truly open and obvious to a personal injury victim.

In the Cring case the Firestone establishment's pothole in question was allegedly obscured or covered up by the shadows of parked cars on either side of the pothole. The pothole in question was the same color as the blacktop surrounding it. Most important to the court was that the Firestone employees that work at the store failed to notice the open and obvious pothole during routine inspections that Firestone claimed occurred at least every morning at its store. The Firestone employees did not have any knowledge of the pothole that caused the delivery driver's personal injury and the court pointed out that it was ironic that Firestone, as the defendant in the suit, would claim that the pothole is open and obvious as a matter of law, when Firestone's employees, who actively inspected the area for hazards, did not discover the pothole at any time prior to the delivery driver's personal injury.

Accordingly, the federal court denied summary judgment or dismissal of the action based on the claim that the condition was open and obvious to the injured delivery driver. In any personal injury slip, trip or fall action our law firm has handled, the issue of whether the condition is open and or obvious is important, and whether the personal injury client may have contributed to the accident by not being vigilant, it is always something to examine.

Many conditions can be hidden or obscured to a person because of the overall color of the area, because of lighting, because of distractions such as signs or nearby activities, and these are always investigated issues. Also, in slip, trip or fall cases, a personal injury  attorney must examine whether the condition was one created by the store or business establishment or its employees, or was the subject condition created by some other customer or other cause.

If our firm can assist you with any slip,trip or fall personal injury, call us toll free today or complete our quick contact form.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

back to top

Doctor Blows Whistle On Washington, DC, Nursing Home Grand Park Care Center

ABC News Channel 7 in Washington D.C. bring us a story about an anonymous emergency room doctor who has alerted authorities to the fact that he has repeatedly seen patients from the Grant Park Care Center adult home who have been seriously neglected and who may die due to their neglect. The doctor told the story to reporter Stephen Tschida.

The doctor said, "They are coming in with acute kidney problems. They are coming in with severe pneumonias. They are coming in with, you know, malnutrition. They have been malnourished and they've been just flat out neglected while in the nursing home."

Inspection reports confirm the doctor's fears: The Washington, D.C., Department of Health found that there were a great number of violations and deficiencies found, especially in the area of patient medical attention. Specifically, there were notes that nurses did not notify doctors of dehydration, significant weight loss, or anemia.  

Carolyn Long removed her loved one from the Grant Park nursing home after she had to take her relative to the hospital on a number of occasions due to problems like dehydration, which can be a red flag for nursing home abuse and neglect.

"She would have died; she was dying," said Long. "On a number of occasions they had to take her to the hospital; I believe it might have been dehydration at one point in time."

D.C. Long Term Care Ombudsman Jerry Kasunic said that they had filed over 100 complaints against the adult care home and that Grant Park is one of the worst nursing homes that he has seen.

Although the officials at Grant Park declined to comment on the story, a general statement was released saying that the staff at Grant Park are committed to continuous quality improvement and that they had recently hired new management.

Read More About Doctor Blows Whistle On Washington, DC, Nursing Home Grand Park Care Center...

back to top

Two School Buses Collide in Summerville, SC, Injuring 39

Greenville Online reports that 39 school children were hospitalized in the wake of a two-bus school bus accident in Summerville, South Carolina near Charleston. However, no children were seriously injured and all of those involved have already been released from the hospital. The accident was caused when one driver entered an intersection without yielding to an oncoming bus.

According to South Carolina Highway Patrolman Bob Beres, a bus carrying special needs students attending Newington Elementary School was hit by a bus carrying Reeves Elementary School children when the former vehicle was pulling out into a two-lane road in Summerville.

The accident occurred on Friday afternoon at 2:25 PM on December 18, as the children were returning form their school day.

Thirty-nine students as well as the Reeves Elementary School bus driver were transported to a local hospital, although most of the students involved were brought to the hospital as a precaution and no one was seriously injured. All of those involved in the accident were back home by nightfall. About half of the children were taken to Summerville Medical Center while the other half were taken to Trident Medical Center. It seems that many of the students are shaken up by the incident but will not suffer long recovery periods or long-term injuries.

"Everyone is fine," said Julie Plummer, the spokesperson for Trident Health System. "Bumps and bruises are probably the worst."

Beres reported that 48-year-old Alzita Miller, the driver of the Newington Elementary bus, has been charged with failure to yield to right-of-way traffic. William Sanders, Jr., of Summerville was the driver of the other bus and was not charged or ticketed for the accident. Miller was not available for comment to any newspapers or stations covering the story.

Read More About Two School Buses Collide in Summerville, SC, Injuring 39...

back to top

Virginia Lawmakers Contemplate New Driving Law To Restrict Texting, Cell Phones, And Open Containers

When Virginia lawmakers return to work in January, there are a number of new rules for the road that will be address during the opening weeks and months of the new session.

When the General Assembly sessions begins again in Richmond, VA, the state's politicians will listen to possible laws for drivers that have gained support and popularity in other states across the country such as California and New Jersey. Especially considering that the state of Virginia is short on funds this year, as are so many states, the policymakers may concentrate on less expensive projects that would promote safety on the roads and hopefully lessen the number of highway injuries and fatalities.

Delegate Algie Howell, a Democrat from Norfolk, will be sponsoring a bill that disallows drivers from sending, receiving, or reading text messages on mobile devices while driving any vehicle (including bicycles). This is the second year in a row that Howell will try to outlaw the dangerous driver distraction so popular among teens and younger drivers. The American Medical Association backs the bill on banning the new technology while driving.

"Texting while driving takes the driver's attention away from the road, which can lead to accidents," said Peter Carmel, an AMA board member. "No one should have to worry that other drivers are focused on texting instead of traffic. This is about keeping people safe on our roads."

Meanwhile, Virginia Beach Democrat Bobby Mathieson will sponsor a bill that requires hands-free devices when driving and talking on the cell phone. These blue-tooth enabled ear buds would allow drivers to keep two hands on the wheel and promote safety. This is also the second year the bill will be offered.

Finally, Virginia Beach Republican Bob Purkey is also trying to make the roads safer through restrictions - he would like to offer a bill that made open containers illegal in any part of a vehicle - not just for the driver of the car or truck. This bill has had difficulty making through the House for years, even though law enforcement endorses the idea. Opponents of the bill claim that the open container laws already on the books are strict enough to prevent drunk driving.

Read More About Virginia Lawmakers Contemplate New Driving Law To Restrict Texting, Cell Phones, And Open Containers...

back to top

$5 Million Wrongful Death Suit Filed Against Grafton Group Home In Virginia

On December 23, 2004, 13-year-old Garrett Halsey died at the Grafton School Group Home in Winchester, Virginia. The boy suffered from autism and mental retardation but had no other health concerns. He had only been at the home for one day before his death.

The Winchester Star reports that the family of Halsey is reviving a $5 million wrongful death claim, which will be heard at the Winchester Circuit Court. The case is being reheard after the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the dismissal of the case previously was a mistake made by Judge John Wetsel.

At the time of his death, the boy was being restrained by six aides at the group home. One staff member was reportedly on the young man's back. Halsey choked on vomit and suffocated to death, according to court reports.

"Garrett's restraint was continued while he vomited and [he] was not released by the staff until they noticed that his ear was blue," the document states. "Vomiting is a sign of distress and everyone should have moved off of Garrett immediately and given him emergency treatment."

A thorough investigation of the event by the Department of Education, Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services, and Department of Social Services found that the Grafton staff was ill trained in restraining residents and unprepared to handle an emergency medical situation. The Halsey family agrees that the Grafton home was not prepared to treat their son and did not draw up a behavioral support plan that would keep their son healthy and safe.

The Grafton home disputed the findings and claimed that they did not show negligence or a lack of concern during the fatal event.

The judge in the 2007 case said that Grafton did not show gross negligence. The Supreme Court, however, has disagreed and sent the case back to trial. No court date has been set as of yet.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.


Read More About $5 Million Wrongful Death Suit Filed Against Grafton Group Home In Virginia...

back to top

Brevard Man Shot To Death By Deer Hunter in Accident – Charges Pending

According to the Citizen-Times of Asheville, North Carolina, authorities are unsure of what actions to take in regards to a hunting accident last weekend. The fatal shooting accident took place in Pisgah National Forest at 1 PM on Sunday when a 21-year-old hunter mistook a hiker for a deer and shot 50-year-old Luciano Martinez Martinez.

Martinez was collecting plants in the national forest, which is open to both hunters and nature enthusiasts for much of the fall and winter. The shooter and his hunting group called 911 and acted responsibly after the accident happened. The hunting group all had up-to-date licenses. Martinez was not wearing hunter's orange, which is recommended by wildlife rangers for safety. He was dead when emergency responders reached the scene.

Transylvania County Sheriff David Mahoney told reporters that his department had met with the U.S. Forest Service, the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission, and a NC District Attorney met to discuss the case in the days after the incident. Although certainly the incident was an accident, there are a wide range of possible charges that the DA, Jeff Hunt, could decide upon.

"Legally, there's a wildlife negligent hunting charge when (a shooting) results in injury or death, and then there's the other charges such as voluntary or involuntary manslaughter," Mahoney said. "There's also the possibility the DA might not file any criminal charges. Right now it's in his hand to review."

The decision on the charges, if any, could come as late as February, when the NC state grand jury meets again.

There were eight fatal hunting accidents last season in North Carolina and 28 serious hunting injures, according to the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission. Many of those accidents involve falls from tree stands or self-inflicted gunshots. There are 400,000 licensed hunters in the state.

Ranger Odell Sanders said that although an accident of this sort is very uncommon, hikers should wear orange and hunters should be very sure of what they are shooting before they pull the trigger.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.



Read More About Brevard Man Shot To Death By Deer Hunter in Accident – Charges Pending...

back to top

Mesothelioma-Asbestos Cancer Verdict for Car Dealership Employee

In November 2008, a southern Florida jury returned a $3.6 million verdict in favor of a 57-year-old woman diagnosed with mesothelioma asbestos lung cancer, after she worked briefly at two automobile dealerships, one being Ford Motor Company. The verdict was returned against Ford Motor Company and one asbestos manufacturer. The plaintiff, Linda Daly, worked at Ford dealerships in 1978 and then again in 1987 but only a year at a time at each dealership. Because she worked as a warranty clerk, her desk was in the service bay area and she was very close to where the work was done on brakes. The other asbestos defendant manufactured brake shoes with asbestos. Ford Motor Company apparently knew about the asbestos brake dangers but failed to warn and protect consumers or workers like the warranty clerk who brought the suit.

Mesothelioma is a terrible form of cancer with no known cure. Most persons diagnosed with this terrible cancer only live six months, but with new therapies of patients are now living up to 24 months after a diagnosis. Still, there is no cure for mesothelioma cancer.

The plaintiff's attorney also noted that her husband worked on cars at their house and she may have been exposed to asbestos containing brakes at home, due to her husband's work with these asbestos containing brakes at home. The thought was to convince the jury that she was exposed not only at her home but also at the Ford dealerships. The jury returned a verdict against both Ford and the asbestos brake manufacturer.

Our firm has handled mesothelioma lung cancer cases or families  been devastated by asbestos exposures that lead to cancer in their family members. If uur law firm can help you or a family member, please fill out our quick contact form or contact us toll-free on this website.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

back to top

Fentanyl Patch Drug Manufacturers Hammered Again by Wrongful Death Verdict

Fentanyl Patch Drug Manufacturers Hammered Again by Wrongful Death Verdict

In what appears to be at least the third plaintiff's victory in a suit over Fentanyl patches (also called Duragesic patches), a jury ordered $13.3 million to the family of a Florida woman who died when a faulty pain patch leaked and flooded her  bloodstream with Fentanyl medication, killing her. The verdict was returned in the state circuit court in Seminole County, Florida. In the case, the attorney for the family called two toxicology experts, as well as an expert in the field of absorption of chemicals by the skin of the body. Also, the family's lawyer had a videotaped deposition of one of the production machine operators employed with a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, called Janssen Pharmaceutica products  LLP. The operator was asked what precautions he and workers at the plant would take when testing the patches and he replied that they wore two sets of gloves. The family's attorney emphasized that the workers wore a double set of gloves because they didn't want the gel to get anywhere on their skin. The jury verdict was returned after 17 days of trial and six hours of deliberations according to Lawyers Weekly USA. The suit also include allegations against a physician's assistant who was called in the middle of the night when Susan Diane Hodgemeyer, the 34-year-old who died of the overdose, had stomach pains. The physician's assistant told her to take Pepto Bismol and try to go back to sleep. She died that night however. The jury also found the physicians assistant partly at fault along with the drug manufacturers.

 

Since that verdict was returned, a Chicago state court jury returned a $16 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson and one of its Fentanyl manufacturer subsidiaries. In that case, a mother also overdosed on Fentanyl because of a faulty patch and because of problems associated with this incredibly dangerous drug/medication. We also have posted other articles on this toxic, lethal drug, and I have blogged on this topic on this website.

 

Depending upon which expert you believe, Fentanyl is more than 100 times more powerful than morphine. The patches are designed to have the medication very slowly absorbed into the skin, but if for any reason an excess amount of medication leaks onto the skin, it can be lethal and cause death. Multiple wrongful death lawsuits are pending against these manufacturers, and our law firm has accepted at least two wrongful death cases that we are currently investigating on behalf of families whose loved ones died from sudden and unforeseen overdoses of the fentanyl medication.

 

There are numerous allegations not only against the manufacturers, but against medical providers who are prescribing Fentanyl patches in circumstances that are questionable. Because of the dangers of this medication, the medication is supposed to only be prescribed in cases of chronic pain and originally was used only on cancer victims. The manufacturers have pressed to have these patches applied in a wide array of other circumstances, and that is why sudden overdoses have become more prevalent.

 

If you or a family member have a question about whether you have a case involving a fentanyl patch overdose or wrongful death, fill out our quick contact form and or call our toll-free number on this website.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

back to top

Clayton Woman Who Killed Teen In Truck Wreck Faces Felony Charges

The North Carolina News & Observer reports that more charges are in store for the Clayton, North Carolina woman, 29-year-old Desiree Olsen, will face more charges in regards to the fatal truck and car accident she was involved in last month in Johnson County.

Both she and 18-year-old Shannon Nicole Adkins were seriously injured in the crash, which occurred when Olsen's pickup crossed the double yellow center line and smashed into Adkins' pickup head on Saturday night. Adkins was driving northbound and Olsen was driving southbound on Buffalo Road. Adkins died after her car overturned during the crash. Olsen was thrown from her truck, which rolled at least once.

The crash happened so close to Adkins' residence that her parents hear the wreck and rushed to the scene.

"She was a wonderful, sweet child who meant the world to so many people," said her aunt, Karmela Adkins. "It's just not fair that she's not here."

Olsen admitted to emergency workers that she had been drinking and later tests by the hospital confirmed that she was intoxicated and not fit to legally drive on the roads. Both North Carolina State Trooper C.T. Oravits and WakeMed confirmed that she was drunk.

Johnston County District Attorney Susan Doyle said that Olsen has been charged with one count of felony death by motor vehicle, and that an element of that charge is driving while intoxicated. The charge could lead to a maximum of eight years in prison for those with prior records, while the minimum sentence is 15 months - a length of time that can be suspended by the judge. As far as officials know now, Olsen has no prior record of reckless driving or DUIs.

Adkins was a recent graduate of Clayton High School. While there, she had completed a study of why such an unusually high number of teens die on Johnson County streets. Over 30 teens have died so far this year, the third highest of any county in North Carolina.

Read More About Clayton Woman Who Killed Teen In Truck Wreck Faces Felony Charges...

back to top

Virginia/Carolina Personal Injury Lawyers - Virginia Workplace Fatalties/Deaths Decrease in 2007

WORKPLACE FATALITIES DECREASE IN 2007

The Virginia Department of Labor and Industry recently reported the number of workplace fatalities/deaths in Virginia decreased by 15% in 2007 from 165 to 141, the lowest number since 1995. The nationwide number of workplace fatalities decreased by 6% to 5,488 in 2007, according to a preliminary estimate released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics in August. The occupation with the largest share of workplace fatalities was tractor-trailer and truck driving which accounted for 21 fatalities. The number of deaths due to workplace falls rose 39% to 25 in Virginia.

The overall decrease seen in workplace fatalities could have several causes, perhaps the most significant of which is that workers are feeling a sense of empowerment with workplace safety which translates into workers taking steps to increase safe practices on the job and companies doing a better job considering the safety of employees. Our law firm has represented several victims of workplace fatalities over the years including serious injuries and wrongful deaths in car accidents involving tractor-trailers.

back to top

South Carolina AARP Will Train Patient Safety Advocates To Prevent Medical Malpractice

Greenvilleonline.com reports that AARP South Carolina will offer patient safety training to more than 200 people across the state. This is a step toward preventing medical errors and toward letting patients know when they should fight back against hospitals and medical professionals when preventable mistakes and negligence do occur. In addition, AARP South Carolina will also take a survey of those participating in the patient safety training to see what their experiences have been like with the states health care system.

According to recent data, an estimated 100,000 die from medical errors.

"When medical error does happen, it's extremely damaging and horribly expensive," says Teresa Arnold, legislative director for AARP South Carolina. "If we can empower people to avoid something like that, it will make this training worthwhile."

The training session will include several guest speakers, including Mothers Against Medical Error founder Helen Haskell, whose son died from a medical error; Dr. Libba Patterson, former director of the state Department of Social Services, who drafted the state's original advance directive statutes; and patient-safety advocates Dr. Bob Schultz of Florida, Dianne Parker of Aiken and Jan Vick of Chesterfield. In addition, Dr. Julia Hallisy, author of The Empowered Patient, will help the students learn how to best avoid costly, devastating, and sometimes deadly consequences of medical errors and medical malpractice.

Many of the speakers will stress that patients' friends and relatives are not just visitors, but active participates in helping their loved ones recover from their ailments and injuries.

"We believe very much in the patient having a family member, significant other or family friend there," Suzanne White, vice president of patient care services for Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center says. "Sometimes the patient can't hear everything that's going on. If a patient chooses to have someone who could be with them 24 hours a day, seven days a week and be part of the education of the patient, knowing the patient condition, we support that."

Read More About South Carolina AARP Will Train Patient Safety Advocates To Prevent Medical Malpractice...

back to top

Johnston County, North Carolina, Holds Teen Driver Safety Forum

The North Carolina Herald reported today that Johnson County, North Carolina held a teen driver safety forum to discuss young adult driving concerns and address recent teen car crash deaths in the area.

Among those present at the Smithfield, North Carolina, meeting was Christy Baker, a mother who lost her 21-year-old son Brandon and his 17-year-old friend Matthew Stewart in a car crash in September. Baker spoke about starting a Teen Control class in the area which would educate both kids and their parents about driving safety. The fee for the class would be small but significant: $169 for a parent-child pair.

"That is three tanks of gas to save your child's life," Baker said to a crowd of 200 people. "Is it worth it? If I could have done it, yes. I would have paid $169 instead of paying what I had to today. I tremble as I stand before you tonight because I never want to see another parent go through what I have gone through."

Baker's classes would focus on hands-on activities that would teach drivers about distractions such as music and cell phones. It would also prepare students to react in dangerous situation - what to do if their car runs off the road or if traffic is bad.

Baker also stated that she wanted to work toward provisional licenses for teens as well as driving curfews between 8 PM and 4 AM.

"An average soccer player has 1,500 practice hours with a coach before getting on that field," Baker said. "We allow our kids 30-50 hours to get out on the streets. It's a war zone out there. We've got to change it. My mission is to reduce teen fatalities by 50 percent in two years."

The forum was put together by County Commissioners Cookie Pope and Tony Braswell, who both are working toward reducing the number of teen fatalities in North Carolina.

The NC Department of Transportation reported that there have been 33 teen fatalities in Johnson County alone this year - the third highest rate in the state. Most of the accidents were due to speeding, while only 6 percent involved alcohol.  

Read More About Johnston County, North Carolina, Holds Teen Driver Safety Forum...

back to top

Elderly Stuarts Draft Virginia Man Killed In Train Crash

Reported by NBC Channel 29 in Virginia, a man died shortly after 10 a.m. in the morning on Monday, November 10, when an oncoming train slammed into the passenger side of the vehicle he was driving. Apparently, the man did not see the oncoming train for some reason, perhaps related to his age.

According to Virginia State Police, the Stuarts Draft man was 84-year-old Gordon William Hunter, who lived on Hunter Farm Lane, a farm he owned that the train tracks run along the edge of. He was leaving his property on Monday morning a few minutes before ten when he drove into the path of the oncoming freight train, not giving the train any time to stop or slow down.

Virginia State Police, Stuarts Draft Fire and Rescue, and a local medical examiner investigated the scene on Monday afternoon. Early conclusions show a simple lack of attention on the part of the driver - he was probably preoccupied with another matter and did not hear or see the train approaching.

Family members concurred that this was probably the case - Anita Ramsey, Hordon Hunter's daughter, talked to authorities. "He always stopped for the tracks, so I am kind of surprised. Him and the train men had a little toot that they did when they saw each other."

The investigators also confirmed that the train did not break any laws and was traveling at the appropriate speeds at the time of the accident - the car drove in front of the train leaving very little time for the conductor to stop in time to avoid the fatal train crash.

Gordon William Hunter was an active member of the community. He was the father of three children and a number of grandchildren. He was also a regular member of the Sherlynd Baptist Church.

Read More About Elderly Stuarts Draft Virginia Man Killed In Train Crash...

back to top

Teen driver found at fault in Beach crash that killed three

VIRGINIA BEACH - An unlicensed teenager driving at 85 mph on a city street, not drunken driving or street racing, caused the brutal accident on Great Neck Road that killed three youths on Nov. 19, experts said Wednesday. The announcement by Commonwealth's Attorney Harvey L. Bryant and police came 10 days after a two-vehicle crash killed brothers Alonzo Jarmon, 18, and Michael Jarmon, 16, and their cousin, Shaqwane Williams, 10.

Read More About Teen driver found at fault in Beach crash that killed three...

back to top

Man Hit While Crossing Virginia Beach Boulevard Dies

The 53 year old man who was struck by a car while walking his bike across Virginia Beach Boulevard has died in the hospital.  The crash, which took place earlier this month, occurred when an eastbound vehicle on the 6000 block of Virginia Beach Boulevard struck the man.

The man had been drinking before the accident. 

The crash is under investigation.

Read More About Man Hit While Crossing Virginia Beach Boulevard Dies...

back to top

North Carolina Man Pleads Guilty To Involuntary Manslaughter After Virginia Car Crash

In April of 2008, Philander Yardley Jordan, a 39-year-old man from Spring Hope, North Carolina, was involved in a fatal car crash in Dale City, Virginia.

Today, InsideNOVA.com reports that Jordan has pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter in regards to the incident. The trial is taking place in Prince William Circuit Court. Jordan is being held without bond until his sentencing on March 5, 2009, when he will likely face one to twenty years in prison for his automobile offence.

In the April accident, Jordan was driving in the right hand southbound lane of I-95 in Dale City, Virginia, when he collided into the back of a car driving on the right soft shoulder of the highway, traveling under the speed limit. The accident happened a few minutes after 8 p.m. near the 158.2 mile marker on Interstate 95, according to Virginia State Police.

The two cars spun out of control after the crash occurred, with both cars coming to rest in the embankment off the side of the road. Although Philander Jordan suffered only minor injuries, the driver of the other vehicle, Michael Niounou of Silver Spring, was seriously injured.

When emergency personnel arrived at the scene, they rushed Niounou to the Fairfax Inova Hospital, where he later died on complications from his injuries.  

In the criminal complaint, Virginia State Trooper Aaron Adams reported that Philander Jordan exhibited signs of being drunk at the scene. When he was tested back at the station, police found that his blood alcohol level was 0.15, almost twice the legal limit of 0.08. The evidence of his drunkenness was also included in the criminal complaint, which is now on file at the Prince William Circuit Court.

Read More About North Carolina Man Pleads Guilty To Involuntary Manslaughter After Virginia Car Crash...

back to top

Former Shipyard Worker Wins 4.39 Million Asbestos Mesothelioma Cancer Verdict in Virginia

According to published reports in the Daily Press, of Newport News, Virginia a Newport News jury returned a $4.39 million mesothelioma asbestos cancer/disease verdict in early September, 2008 in favor of John Koonce, 59, a former Norfolk shipbuilding and dry dock Corp. worker. The verdict in the mesothelioma case was returned after a 2 1/2 week jury trial.  Our firm has a strong interest in asbestos/mesothelioma disease affecting railroad workers and other workers in the Virginia/Carolina area and beyond.

 

Koonce originally contracted the asbestos related cancer/disease in April, 2006 his personal injury lawyers and doctors believed that the asbestos exposure he experience came from working in boiler rooms on liberty ships between 1968 and 1971.

 

John Crane Inc. is responsible for the entire 4.3 million Dollar verdict but has asked the judge who heard the trial to set aside the jury verdict because it did not apportion or attribute any part of the verdict to another defendant in the case, Garlock Sealing Technologies, however, Koonce's personal injury lawyers have argued there was no jury mistake. Virginia and many states instruct members of the jury that if they have no way of determining how to divide damages between multiple defendants, that they may find each of the defendants equally responsible. Virginia follows what is called joint and several liability, although some other states have now changed the common law and allow a jury to apportion damages between defendants.

 

The suit claimed that John Crane Inc. knew and should've known that breathing asbestos fibers was very dangerous and that it was negligent in failing to test its products and warn workers in a timely way.

 

In order to prove negligence in an asbestos/cancer/mesothelioma case, it is crucial to have attorneys/lawyers that have both knowledge of the field and real trial experience. The Law Firm of Shapiro, Cooper, Lewis and Appleton routinely confer with some of the foremost medical experts in the country on behalf of their clients, and have a long and distinguished history of taking cases to trial with successful results. If you or a loved one has been the victim of an asbestos injury or death, please contact our offices for a free consultation today.

 

back to top

Charitable Foundation Affiliated with the East Virginia Medical School Denied Medical Malpractice Immunity

According to the Associated Press, The Virginian Pilot, and the Virginia Daily Press, The Virginia Supreme Court has ruled against a charitable foundation in regards to the organization's request for immunity from medical malpractice lawsuits.

The health foundation, called the EVMS Academic Physicians and Surgeons Health Services Foundation, is affiliated with the Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS). Beginning immediately, the doctors working for the foundation will not be protected with immunity from any medical malpractice complaints filed against them. In the past the foundation had been claiming charitable immunity in malpractice suits brought against them. The decision was made on Friday, October 31.

In their decision today, the Virginia Supreme Court brought up a similar case that was decided earlier in the year involving very similar circumstance. In that case, which took place in February of 2008, a number of doctors affiliated with the University of Virginia in Charlottesville were taking advantage of their charitable immunity against medical malpractice suits until the courts ruled against them.

Today the Supreme Court argued that the Eastern Virginia Medical School case is much like the University of Virginia, Charlottesville case: the amount of charity work done by the EVMS Health Services Foundation is too small in comparison to its income and the foundation is run too much like a business to be considered fully charitable. In addition, the court added, the organization receives some funding from the state to care for patients in need of health care services.  

What does this mean for patients? If you were treated at either foundation by an affiliated doctor and have a medical malpractice complaint, you are now able to take them to court for their negligence whereas before they would be protected by their charitable immunity.

Read More About Charitable Foundation Affiliated with the East Virginia Medical School Denied Medical Malpractice Immunity...

back to top

Five Die In Violent Harnett County NC Truck Wreck

In Dunn, North Carolina on October 25, a tragic three-vehicle accident took the lives of five North Carolina residents. The Associated Press reports that three men and two women were driving in a Honda Accord when the driver of the car ran a stop sign and were run over by a gasoline-filled tanker truck in the intersection. All five passengers, who resided in the Raleigh area, were killed.

The crash took place on Friday night around 11 p.m. at the intersection of North Carolina Highway 27 and Old Fairgrounds Road, about 20 miles south of Raleigh. Trooper Gregg Steffens told reporters that after the truck hit the sedan, both vehicles ran into the oncoming lane, where a Oldsmobile station wagon hit the wreckage. The tanker did not explore and it's tank was not damaged in the crash causing any leak of gasoline.

The North Carolina Highway Patrol reported that the driver of the Honda Accord was 22-year-old Esteban Isidro of Raleigh. The others killed were 23-year-old Jorge Luis Gallardo of Raleigh, 25-year-old Germain Chavez of Angier, 17-year-old Ashley Martinez, and 15-year-old Norma Marie Martinez. The two women were sisters who lived in Angier, and one of the two women was pregnant.

The North Carolina News & Observer reported that all five victims died at the scene.

"The tanker truck literally crushed the vehicle," Steffens said. "It was unrecognizable as a vehicle. It was a non-survivable collision."

The driver of the station wagon, Kimberly Jones, 18, of Benson, was treated for a broken ankle and broken collar bone at Betsy Johnson Regional Hospital in Dunn and released Saturday morning. The driver of the tanker truck, Ronnie Vanatta Jr., 41, of Pikeville, was treated for minor injuries at the scene of the crash.

The police are still investigating whether or not alcohol was a factor in the crash, as the driver of the Honda did not appear to try to stop at the intersection.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.



Read More About Five Die In Violent Harnett County NC Truck Wreck...

back to top

West Virginia Man Attempts To Sue Doctor For Scalpel Blade In Thumb, Battles Statute of Limitations

The Charleston Gazette and the Associated Press both reported the case of a man attempting to sue his doctor for medical malpractice for leaving a scalpel blade in his thumb during a surgery ten years ago.

The medical malpractice victim, Paul Forshey of Parkersburg, West Virginia, filed his lawsuit against his physician, Dr. Theodore Jackson of Charleston, more than 11 years after the initial surgery. However, a circuit city judge in Kanawha County ruled that the complaint be dismissed due to the 10-year statute of limitations placed on such medical malpractice cases.

Forshey has a career as a locksmith and needs his hands to work. In 1995, the man had surgery to help fix his carpel tunnel syndrome. However, after the surgery, he suffered from shooting pains, loss of grip, and numbness. He wasn't sure what was wrong until ten years later, when he injured his thumb and went in for a routine x-ray - his new doctor discovered a scalpel blade embedded in his hand.

"I almost passed out. I couldn't realize there was I think an inch-and-a-half-long blade, surgical blade in my hand and that answered a lot of my questions over the ten years," Forshey told WOWK Channell 13. "My children would grab my hand and it would put me to my knees and my daughter - being just a baby or two, three years old - she'd want to know what was wrong with my hand," he said.

"He couldn't put any kind of force on his palm and you know, he's a very hands-on type of guy and he likes to be able to do things and he always felt like he was a failure because there's something wrong with my hand but I can't figure out what it is," said Paul's wife Melissa Forshey.

Forshey and his lawyer plan to take their case to the West Virginia Supreme Court. Although the couple isn't seeking specific damages, they want their story and case to be heard, and for justice to be done. Even D. Jackson admits that he was the one to accidentally leave the scalpel blade behind.

"I'll never get my hand back. That's something he took and he took a lot of things from me," said Forshey.

The case should be heard by the West Virginia Supreme Count within the next month.

Read More About West Virginia Man Attempts To Sue Doctor For Scalpel Blade In Thumb, Battles Statute of Limitations...

back to top

Roanoke Times Editorial Slams Medical Malpractice Damages Cap

An anonymous opinion piece in the Friday, October 31 edition of the Roanoke Times spoke out against the $2 million maximum that medical malpractice victims can now collect as damages from doctors, hospitals, and insurance companies.

The $2 million damages cap tops out on July, and the Virginia State Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the cap several times in the recent past. It was established in 1999.

The main thrust of the editorial is that there are many cases in which the maximum $2 million amount will not cover the medical malpractice victim's full spectrum of damages, which would cover medical expenses, lost income, ongoing physical therapy, long-term disabilities, pain and suffering, and other non-economic costs. In addition, the limit on damages will become less and less appropriate and negatively impact more and more medical malpractice victims.

The article highlights the case of a Clifton Forge woman named Donita Franklin, who sued a doctor after a botched foot surgery. Although her doctor denied any kind of medical malpractice, Franklin and her lawyer won the case. A Roanoke jury awarded her $3.5 million in damages for her lost wages, medical bills, and pain and suffering, but due to the damages caps at the time, Franklin will only receive about half of that - $1.6 million. Her lawyer points out that the amount Franklin is awarded won't begin to cover the amount that his client lost due to the surgery - and that the damages cap renders cases like this unjust.  Even though she won her case, she may still end up in financial ruin, with assets like her house, car, and financial security hanging in the balance.

The piece also mentions infant cases of medical malpractice, and how it is so difficult to know how much such a young life is altered with doctors' mistakes - millions of dollars in lost wages, untold pain and suffering, and perhaps lifelong ongoing medical expenses. And yet all of these cases will not be able to exceed $2 million.

Furthermore, the author asks, why shouldn't doctors and their insurance companies be held responsible for their mistakes? If the cap was put into place to keep malpractice insurance premiums down, it was a bad idea in the first place since multiple studies show that damage caps have little to no effect on medical malpractice insurance costs.

Finally, the article asks the Virginia General Assembly to re-examine the particulars of this policy and take a more careful and effective approach to medical malpractice reform in Virginia.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.


Read More About Roanoke Times Editorial Slams Medical Malpractice Damages Cap...

back to top

CNN Reports Out Of Quantico, Virginia: More Marines Die on Motorcycles Than In Iraq

CNN National News reported a scary trend for aggressive motorcycle drivers this week: in the last year, more Marines have died riding motorcycles than fighting in Iraq. Reporting out of Quantico, Virginia, CNN Pentagon reporter Larry Shaughnessy wrote that 25 Marines died on the roads due to bike accidents in the last 12 months, while 20 Marines have been killed engaging in combat in Iraq.

All but one of the motorcycle accidents involved sport motorcycles that, according to the Marine officials interviewed, can reach speeds well over 100 miles per hour. Numbers-wise, about 18,000 of the 200,000 Marines own and ride motorcycles.

Marine commanders are addressing the issue, according to Gen. James Amos, the assistant commandant of the Marine Corps. Amos told CNN that what "we need to do to help our Marines survive on these sport bikes."

"The Marines are very serious about it," he said.

To show they are serious, Marine officials will spend a half-day on Monday, November 3, focusing on the issue of motorcycle fatalities, injuries, and safety. The meeting will include Marine Corps commandant General James Conway and take place at the Marie base in Quantico, Virginia.

Other branches of the military have also reported a similar deadly trend in motorcycle accidents among their ranks – the Navy has recorded 33 deaths over the past year, a 65 percent jump. Although military officials are not sure what is causing the rise in crashes, they do know that it doesn’t have to do with age – although many assumed it was very young soldiers who were inexperienced on bikes, the statistics reveal that the average age was 25, with some victims being in their 40s. Some point to the fact that it is now popular for units to have motorcycle clubs, which may encourage more riders. Others mention the fact that riding often relaxes the stressed Marines.

The Marines now offer a sport bike training course, which over 300 men and women have now taken. Only three people who have attended the training have been involved in accidents. Any Marine caught riding a motorcycle without having attended the basic training course faces consequences.

Instead of discouraging sport bike riding altogether, they are encouraging training, safety, and smart choices.

Read More About CNN Reports Out Of Quantico, Virginia: More Marines Die on Motorcycles Than In Iraq...

back to top

Railroads Must Protect Bridges and Ditches with Better Markings

             Our firm is currently handling a case where a railroad worker, who was sent into a new geographical work area, was not warned that he was dismounting and getting off his train virtually right on top of a bridge over a  ditch/water run off area.  When he attempted to dismount the train, he landed not on firm railroad ballast, but dropped 15 feet into a ditch with a running stream.  The worker suffered a fracture of his pelvis and permanent injuries.  His case is pending.  I inspected the injury area.  At night the bridge/culvert area was pitch black.  No signs of any nature warned of the bridge or elevated area.  A walkway beside the track was built on only one side of the bridge also.

             Railroads like Norfolk Southern (NS) or CSX have various maintenance of way procedures that specify track structure around bridges, culverts and ditches. However, the rules relating to workers such as conductors and engineers working in or near bridges have some less then desirable protections.  For example, there are numerous small ditches, culverts, and the equivalent of bridges on many areas of railroad track, but there are apparently no uniform systems of having some visible marker that is like a reflective landmark so a worker working in the area realizes that there’s a small bridge or culvert near by.  This does not require an electrical source.  Reflective paint, and even a simple solar panel can illuminate a marker. If you have been involved in any type of injury involving a bridge, culvert or marking relating on the railroad, our firm can assist you.  Please call us for a free initial consultation.

Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia practicing primarily in the Southeastern U.S. and handles only injury law, including car, truck, railroad, and medical negligence cases.  The firm's website is:  www.hsinjurylaw.com , and the firm edits two injury law blogs:  Virginia Beach Injuryboard & Norfolk Injuryboard.

back to top

Overturned Truck Shuts Down Godwin Boulevard on SR 10 in Suffolk

According to the Daily Press, a pig truck rollover on State Route 10 in Virginia at around 9 Am on September 8 shut down Godwin Boulevard for the morning.

The truck in question was heading northbound on SR 10 when the car in front of him slowed down in order to make a left turn. The truck may have been speeding or following too close and had to run off the road into a ditch on the right side of the highway. The truck struck a power pole before coming to a stop.

According to Suffolk, Virginia, city spokesperson Debbie George, there were 190 pigs on board the tractor-trailer at the time of the truck accident. Some of the pigs were loose after the big rig crash, although George was not informed whether any of the animals were hurt or injured during the crash. All of the animals were eventually found, examined, and recovered. The hogs, from Goldsboro Hog Farms, weighed an average of 265 pounds each.

A recovery team and local veterinarian were called in to the scene, where they helped load the animals onto a second truck, while the Chuckatuck Volunteer Fire Department sprayed the pigs with water to keep them cool until they were recovered onto the second truck. The recovery team consisted of a group from Murphy-Brown, which raises hogs and transports them for the company Smithfield Foods. It is a competitor of Goldsboro Hog Farms.

The animal collection, followed by the truck getting turned upright and removed, took several hours and disturbed traffic flow in the surrounding area. All in all, the road was closed for six hours.

The driver was a Warsaw, North Carolina native, James E. Carver. Police charged him with reckless driving for failing to maintain proper control of his truck while on the road.

The Virginia-Pilot reported that 65 of the pigs were killed and that five hogs escaped. Some of the injured pigs were euthenized by the vet on the scene.


About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.


Read More About Overturned Truck Shuts Down Godwin Boulevard on SR 10 in Suffolk...

back to top

The New York Times Reports that 100 Percent of District of Columbia Nursing Homes are Deficient

In a frightening and eye-opening piece in The New York Times today, reporter Robert Pear wrote that 94 percent of nursing homes across the country have violations, and that a full and staggering 100 percent of Washington, DC, elder care facilities have violations.

In the article, Pear expands to say that the report was made by the Department of Human Services and that the study also found that 17 percent of nursing homes suffered from problems that caused "actual harm or immediate jeopardy."

Nursing home abuse inspectors received 37,150 complaints nationwide last year, with 39 percent of those complains holding water, the inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services Daniel R. Levinson told The New York Times. Twenty percent of the complaints were verified by both federal and state agents who concluded that the claims did indeed involve the abuse and neglect of the elders in their care.

Among the laundry list of problems mentioned, poor nutrition, medication mix-ups, infected bedsores, and general cases of neglect and abuse were the most common complaints, with for-profit homes incurring more complains than other kinds of senior living facilities. Two out of three nursing homes are privately run for-profit entities, while the remainder are non-profits or government-run facilities.

Other types of abuse other than physical cases were also recorded. For example, Levinson cited that many for-profit sites billed their patients and their patients families for services that were not provided at all.

"For-profit nursing homes had a higher average number of deficiencies than the other types of nursing homes," Mr. Levinson said. "In 2007, for-profit nursing homes averaged 7.6 deficiencies per home, while not-for-profit and government homes averaged 5.7 and 6.3, respectively."

In response to these shocking numbers, Levinson has issued a compliance guide for the elder care homes that performed especially badly this year. He also pointed out that the inspection system as it stands now is not working properly. As the system stands now, the country's 15,000 nursing homes are inspected once a year. Passing inspection is one condition for the adult care facilities to participate in the Medicaid and Medicare programs that cover over two-thirds of their residents.

Bruce Yardwood, the president of the American Health Care Association, agreed that although nursing home facilities need to do a better job, the system of inspection was also flawed. "We know we have to do a better job. We have been doing a better job, in treating pressure sores, managing pain and reducing the use of physical restraints. [the inspection system] does not reliably measure quality," he continued. "It does not create any positive incentives."

Read More About The New York Times Reports that 100 Percent of District of Columbia Nursing Homes are Deficient...

back to top

Five Die In South Carolina On Same Stretch of Pleasantburg Drive Railroad Tracks

According to Greenville Online, five different people have been struck and killed by trains while walking on the underground railroad tracks that run near Pleasantburg Drive and Rutherford Road in Greenville, South Carolina.

The latest victim, Scotty Goranson, 33, routinely walked the tracks according to family members. He was hit and killed at the end of September, after the engineer blew his horn repeatedly at the young man. His mother, Mary Jane Timm, said that he enjoyed walking on the tracks regularly, especially after he lost his car earlier in the year.

"I knew he walked on the tracks to get from one town to another," Timm said. "It's dangerous to walk on the railroad tracks I told him."

However, Robin Chapman, spokesperson for transportation company Norfolk Southern Corp., pointed out that the practice is not only unsafe, but against the law as well.

"It's illegal to walk on the tracks," he said. "I get daily reports on any given week that there are incidents in our 22-state system."

Greenville County Sheriff Officer Tim Ridgeway was one of the first officers at the scene of thr train accident. He also mentioned that although many don't realize it, walking on the train tracks is not legal and can often be deadly.

In other parts of South Carolina, there have been nine other trespass deaths on other stretches of railroad tracks, according to Operation Lifesaver, a railroad safety organization that works in conjunction with Norfolk Southern and other railroad operators. However, the Pleasantburg Drive corridor of the tracks has proved to be especially deadly.

In December of 2004, Angel Ramirez was struck while walking home from his job at the Columbia Farms chicken processing factory - his body was found 20 feet from the tracks. In July 2005, Charles Brantley was also killed in the same area - he had either fallen or was sleeping on the tracks.

Many incidents are the product of people running in front of the trains after misjudging the speed of the trains.

"That's a common misperception," Chapman said. "The person (Goranson) was hit when he crossed from one track to another," he said, mentioning that the length of the trains can be confusing. ""You can't tell if it's going 25 mph or 50 mph. Very often, you don't know until it's too late."

Read More About Five Die In South Carolina On Same Stretch of Pleasantburg Drive Railroad Tracks...

back to top

Three Die In Four Car Accidents In Deadly Day For Washington, DC, Roads

NBC News Channel 4 reported that September 20, 2008, in Washington, DC, saw four separate serious car crashes that resulted in three deaths in and around the District. In addition to the fatalities, a number of other drivers and passengers involved in the car crashes were severely injured. All four of the accidents occurred in the early morning hours of the day.

In the first accident, a woman driving a car crashed in to a van loaded with seven passengers. The car and van accident happened just before five in the morning at the intersection of Pennsylvania Ave and Alton Street. While the woman in the car suffered severe injuries, one adult van passenger died.

A few hours earlier, another person was killed in a mysterious one-car crash on the 1500 block of Livingston Road in Washington. Authorities are investigating whether the person killed was driving or whether there was another person operating the vehicle at the time of the crash. Livingston Road was shut down for several hours due to the car accident.

At about midnight on the same day, there was another car crash fatality on the 600 block of Old Crane Road. As with the Livingston crash, police officials are still investigating the particulars of what caused the crash and how many people were initially involved in the accident.

Finally, at 4:30 AM, two cars crashed on I-495 just before dawn around Richie Marlboro Road. In this car crash, there were no fatalities, although one victim was taken to the hospital with serious injuries.

The names of the victims were not available, although it was confirmed that none of those killed were juveniles.

Read More About Three Die In Four Car Accidents In Deadly Day For Washington, DC, Roads...

back to top

Charleston, West Virginia, Wrongful Death Case Could Face Retrial

According to the West Virginia Record, a doctor and hospital were cleared of wrongful death charges by a jury in June 2006. However, because of an appeal that claims that two of the jurours were biased may bring the case to a retrial in the West Virginia Supreme Court.

In 2000, Phyllis Macek died during an emergency colonoscopy at Weirton Medical Center when her doctor, Carl Jones, perforated her colon during the surgery. The medical malpractice and wrongful death court case, brought in by the administrators of Phyllis Macek's estate, Robert and Lawrence Macek, occureed at the Brooke Circuit Court.

Now, two years after the decision was made that a wrongful death did not take place, the Mackets have argued that jurors David A. George and Glen Stolburg should not have sat in on the case and that there should be a retrial.

Initially, during the questioning of the juror pool, six jurors were struck from the case "for cause" although only four were ultimately removed. Despite some biased answers from George and Stolburg, they remained on the case.

George was in question after he mentioned that many medical malpractice suits were frivolous and the result of greed. They also found that he was biased because he knew a Wheeling, West Virginia doctor personally who had lost a million dollar law suit.

"Mr. George did state in his Questionnaire in response to if he could return a verdict against Dr. Jones if he found him negligent: 'If I believe that his guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt, I would probably have no choice,'" the Court stated in its order. "Mr. George's incorrect assumption of the standard of proof in a civil medical malpractice case, as opposed to a criminal case, is very common among prospective jurors and does not readily indicate a bias."

The other juror, Stolburg, may have answered a question untruthfully by saying that he had not read, heard, or discussed the subject of medical negligence actions, lawsuits, or liability crisis. However, Stolburg works for Ogden Publishing, which is very vocal and biased in its position on medical malpractice trials. Stolburg, however, argued that although he sold the paper, he didn't often read it.

"If questions were raised, the judge would individually call them in his chambers and qualify them," Brooks said at the Supreme Court oral hearing. "I think a clear reading of the transcript shows a lack of bias."

The doctor and hospital hold that neither jury was biased and that the court ruling should stand.

"In both instances, the totality of information provided by Mr. George and Mr. Stolburg never reached the threshold for bias and prejudice that justifies a characterization of questioning of either of them as 'rehabilitation,'" the brief they filed with the state Supreme Court states.

Read More About Charleston, West Virginia, Wrongful Death Case Could Face Retrial...

back to top

Use of global positioning systems increases in criminal and civil injury cases

We have written recently about the increasing use of computers in trucking injury cases, as well as car accident cases, because of the common use of the black boxes in vehicles.  Now, trucking companies have added sophisticated onboard computers that not only track the truck's whereabouts, hours in use, speed, and other variables, but can be used by personal injury lawyers to prove that a trucker was speeding or had driven more than the legal hours of service.

 

Global positioning systems are being used in criminal cases as well. Prosecutors in Chicago used a Garmin global positioning system device in a Chevrolet Trailblazer to help prove the murder of family members in a recent criminal murder trial. Here are some of the uses of global positioning system computer data:

 

In a criminal case alleging a rape, a judge ruled that evidence from a global positioning system in the defendant's car could be used against him at trial.

 

In a Pennsylvania trucking case, the trucker's global positioning system caused police to charge him with setting his own home on fire. The GPS system showed his vehicle/big rig was parked about 100 yards from the house in question.

 

The Consumer Electronics Association has estimated that about 20% of American households own a portable global positioning system and almost 10% have vehicles equipped with such systems built into cars or vehicles.

 

The use of new technology tends to find its way in to the courts, and shows itself a year or two behind the technology used by consumers and businesses. I can only predict that GPS technology will have a growing influence in car/truck injury cases that are in litigation. Also, the ability to falsify driver logs will be severely compromised because this computer data is maintained on a hard drive remote from the truck driver’s location. Personal injury lawyers must be vigilant to ensure that they obtain this material and when it mysteriously disappears or cannot be made available, it will likely mean that the data is extremely damaging to a company.

 

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

 

back to top

West Virginia Woman Wins $1.54 Million Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice Verdict

According to Curtis Johnson of The Herald-Dispatch out of Huntington, West Virginia, a Cabell County jury awarded the widow of Thomas L. Thornburg $1.54 million damages over a 2002 lawsuit involving medical malpractice and wrongful death that led to her late husband's severe brain damage.

The suit was against Huntington Anesthesia Group, Inc., which was accused of failing to notice the deteriorating vital signs of their patient. Thornburg entered surgery so that surgeons could install an automatic implantable cardiovascular defibrillator at St. Mary's Medical Center. The anesthesia team's inadequate attention to Thornburg's lack of breathing led to an extended period of time in which his brain was deprived of the oxygen it needed. He suffered severe brain damage.

The trail consisted of a week of evidence and testimony, which resulted in an August 13 verdict that cleared the doctor of any wrongdoing but faulted a nursing anesthetist for negligence during the surgical procedure. More specifically, Dr. Stan Striz was found to have met the accepted standard of care, but Robert Zhea, the certified registered nursing anesthetist, was blamed for the man's permanent brain damage.

Although the surgery was a success as far as his defibrillator was concerned, Thornton's quality of life was severely damaged - with his overall health and mental condition preventing a 2006 operation to further repair his heart. After a second cardiac episode, doctors decided not to continue treatment.

This million-dollar payment comes on the heels of a pre-trail settlement between Thornton's widow and St. Mary's Medical Center, in which the hospital in question paid $115,000 for Thornton's wrongful death.

Although Thornton's wife is remaining anonymous and declining comment, the family attorney spoke about the final decision.

"I was real glad for my client," he said. "They get some compensation for the loss of a husband and loss of a father. That's the whole purpose. It doesn't replace him. It's silly to think that, but it certainly gives them some feeling that justice was done and that is our way, in the United States, of compensating victims of negligence."

Neither Huntington Anesthesia Group, Inc., St. Mary's Medical Center, or their attorneys could be reached for comment.

The break down of the verdict included a large $1.1 million for non-economic losses. Although this number is greater than the $850,000 limit that West Virginia imposes on such cases, the case was from 2002 and pre-dated the medical malpractice reforms. The award will be divided between Thornton's widow and their two children, with the widow receiving 70 percent of the money and his children each receiving 15 percent.

Read More About West Virginia Woman Wins $1.54 Million Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice Verdict...

back to top

Three Die in Multi-Vehicle 1-95 Truck Accident

According to scnow.com, authorities are still looking for answers in relation to a late-night three-vehicle accident that occurred on I-95 just before midnight on July 29. Three people died due to injuries sustained in the crash, including an 8-year-old boy, Deraa Hago of London. The other two fatalities were Abdurahman Abdurahman, 20, a college student, and Dofonias Debebe, also 20. All three were pronounced dead at the crash, according to Florence County Coroner M.G. "Bubba" Matthews.

SC Highway Patrol reported that the crash took place at mile marker 170 and a South Carolina rest stop along
I-95 and happened at 11:45 PM.

Some investigation has shown that the multi-vehicle pileup was started when a van carrying 10 people and driven by a 50-year-old man from Washington, D.C., collided with an empty log truck driven by a 39-year old man.

One other serious injury from the crash was also reported: a person driving a 2008 Toyota van was airlifted to a Wilmington, North Carolina hospital for treatment and remains there presently.

Florence County has seen two multiple fatality crashes in the last two months, South Carolina Highway Patrolmen reported.

The first of the serious accidents occurred on June 14, when a drunk driver plowed into the back of a 1980 Chevrolet with his Volvo. The Cevrolet was carrying five passengers. Two children, Jamahl Robinson, 4, and Shajaisia Robinson, 9, died as a result of their serious injuries as well as Armenis Cato, Jr., 55. Two other occupants of the car, including the children's mother, were treated for their injuries at a local hospital.

The driver of the Volvo, a 31-year-old Florence man by the name of Phillip Ronald Marshall, has been charged with five counts of
felony for driving under the influence due to the car crash he caused, according to Florence County Detention Center booking reports. Although Marshall was being help in an Effingham jail, he was release on June 26 after posting bail for $65,000 and expressing remorse to a judge at the bond meeting.

According to WPDE News Channel 15 out of South Carolina, Bernadette Robinson, the woman who lost her two children and her boyfriend in the crash, asked the judge to deny bail. Everyone in the courtroom was emotional, including the families of the victims and the family of the man accused.

Police are not yet releasing the blood alcohol level of Marshall.

About the Editors: Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm is based in Virginia (VA), near the NE North Carolina (NC) border and handles car,truck,railroad, and medical negligence cases and more. Our lawyers proudly edit the Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard, and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as a pro bono public information service. Lawyers licensed in: VA, NC, SC, WV, DC, KY.

Read More About Three Die in Multi-Vehicle 1-95 Truck Accident...

back to top

Democratic Vice Presidential Nominee Joe Biden Has Tragic History With Truck Accidents

Washington, D.C., Senator Joe Biden has been a headliner in the news all week after Presidential nominee Barack Obama selected the Pennsylvania-born politician as his choice for Vice President early on Saturday morning.  Biden h